Volatility forecasting of crude oil market: Can the regime switching GARCH model beat the single-regime GARCH models?

被引:64
作者
Zhang, Yue-Jun [1 ,2 ]
Yao, Ting [1 ,2 ]
He, Ling-Yun [3 ]
Ripple, Ronald [4 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Ctr Resource & Environm Management, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Jinan Univ, Inst Resource Environm & Sustainable Dev Res, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Tulsa, Collins Coll Business, 800 South Tucker Dr, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Crude oil market; Volatility forecasting; GARCH; Regime switching; MCS; TIME-SERIES; STOCK-MARKET; CONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY; FREQUENCY VOLATILITY; PRICE VOLATILITY; RISK; MOMENTS; FAMILY; RETURN;
D O I
10.1016/j.iref.2018.09.006
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
GARCH-type models are frequently used to forecast crude oil price volatility, and whether we should consider multiple regimes for the GARCH-type models is of great significance for the forecasting work but does not have a final conclusion yet. To that end, this paper estimates and forecasts crude oil price volatility using three single-regime GARCH (i.e., GARCH, GJR-GARCH and EGARCH) and two regime-switching GARCH (i.e., MMGARCH and MRS-GARCH) models. Furthermore, the Model Confidence Set (MCS) procedure is employed to evaluate the forecasting performance. The in-sample results show that the MRS-GARCH model provides higher estimation accuracy in weekly data. However, the out-of-sample results show the limited significance of considering the regime switching. Overall, our results indicate that the incorporation of regime switching does not perform significantly better than the single-regime GARCH models. The findings are proved to be robust to both daily and weekly data for WTI and Brent over different time horizons.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 317
页数:16
相关论文
共 72 条
[2]   A Markov regime switching approach for hedging energy commodities [J].
Alizadeh, Amir H. ;
Nomikos, Nikos K. ;
Pouliasis, Panos K. .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2008, 32 (09) :1970-1983
[3]   Regime Changes and Financial Markets [J].
Ang, Andrew ;
Timmermann, Allan .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, VOL 4, 2012, 4 :313-337
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Handbook of Econometrics, DOI [10.1016/S1573-4412(05)80018-2, DOI 10.1016/S1573-4412(05)80018-2]
[5]   Modelling long memory and structural breaks in conditional variances: An adaptive FIGARCH approach [J].
Baillie, Richard T. ;
Morana, Claudio .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2009, 33 (08) :1577-1592
[6]   Fractionally integrated generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity [J].
Baillie, RT ;
Bollerslev, T ;
Mikkelsen, HO .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1996, 74 (01) :3-30
[7]   GENERALIZED AUTOREGRESSIVE CONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY [J].
BOLLERSLEV, T .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1986, 31 (03) :307-327
[8]   Causality between oil prices and the stock market in China: The relevance of the reformed oil product pricing mechanism [J].
Bouri, Elie ;
Chen, Qian ;
Lien, Donald ;
Lv, Xin .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2017, 48 :34-48
[9]   A MARKOV MODEL OF SWITCHING-REGIME ARCH [J].
CAI, J .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 1994, 12 (03) :309-316
[10]   Volatility regimes, asymmetric basis effects and forecasting performance: An empirical investigation of the WTI crude oil futures market [J].
Chang, Kuang-Liang .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (01) :294-306