Increased post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis for choledocholithiasis without acute cholangitis

被引:5
|
作者
Saito, Hirokazu [1 ]
Kadono, Yoshihiro [2 ]
Shono, Takashi [3 ]
Kamikawa, Kentaro [5 ]
Urata, Atsushi [5 ]
Nasu, Jiro [4 ]
Imamura, Haruo [5 ]
Matsushita, Ikuo [3 ]
Kakuma, Tatsuyuki [6 ]
Tada, Shuji [1 ]
机构
[1] Kumamoto City Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Kumamoto, Japan
[2] Tsuruta Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Kumamoto, Japan
[3] Kumamoto City Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Kumamoto, Japan
[4] Kumamoto City Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Kumamoto, Japan
[5] Saiseikai Kumamoto Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Kumamoto, Japan
[6] Kurume Univ, Dept Biostat Ctr, Sch Med, Fukuoka, Japan
关键词
Acute cholangitis; Common bile duct stone; ERCP; Post-ERCP pancreatitis; ERCP-RELATED COMPLICATIONS; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; GUIDELINES; CANNULATION; MANAGEMENT; SEVERITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/jgh.15704
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aim Choledocholithiasis is the most common indication for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Identifying risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is important for reducing the risk of developing PEP after common bile duct (CBD) stone removal. However, studies examining the risk factors for PEP for CBD stones are scarce. The aim of this study was to examine whether the presence or absence of acute cholangitis is a clinical risk factor for PEP in patients with CBD stones. Methods In this multicenter retrospective study, 1539 patients with naive papillae were divided into patients without and with acute cholangitis. We compared the incidence of PEP between the two groups using one-to-one propensity score matching to adjust for the potential confounding factors of PEP. Results In the entire cohort, the rates of PEP in patients without and with acute cholangitis were 9.6% (52/542) and 1.8% (18/997), respectively (P < 0.001, odds ratio = 5.8). In the propensity-matched cohort, the rates of PEP in patients without and with acute cholangitis were 8.3% (27/326) and 2.5% (8/326), respectively (P = 0.002, odds ratio = 3.6). The rate of PEP was significantly higher in patients without acute cholangitis than in those with acute cholangitis after adjusting for the confounding factors of PEP. Conclusions The absence of acute cholangitis may be an important clinical risk factor for PEP due to CBD stone removal. In patients without acute cholangitis, endoscopists should explain the specific risk of PEP carefully and actively implement prophylaxis against PEP.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 334
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Increased Use of Prophylactic Measures in Preventing Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis
    Christina J. Sperna Weiland
    Megan M. L. Engels
    Alexander C. Poen
    Abha Bhalla
    Niels G. Venneman
    Jeanin E. van Hooft
    Marco J. Bruno
    Robert C. Verdonk
    Paul Fockens
    Joost P. H. Drenth
    Erwin J. M. van Geenen
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2021, 66 : 4457 - 4466
  • [22] How to Prevent Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis
    Boskoski, Ivo
    Costamagna, Guido
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 158 (08) : 2037 - 2040
  • [23] Increased fat in pancreas not associated with risk of pancreatitis post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
    Pokhrel, Bhupesh
    Choi, Eun Kwang
    Khalid, Omer
    Sandrasegaran, Kumar
    Fogel, Evan L.
    McHenry, Lee
    Sherman, Stuart
    Watkins, James
    Cote, Gregory A.
    Pitt, Henry A.
    Zyromski, Nicholas J.
    Juliar, Beth
    Lehman, Glen A.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 7 : 199 - 204
  • [24] A Comparison of the Consensus and Clinical Definitions of Pancreatitis With a Proposal to Redefine Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis
    Artifon, Everson L. A.
    Chu, Adrienne
    Freeman, Martin
    Sakai, Paulo
    Usmani, Ashar
    Kumar, Atul
    PANCREAS, 2010, 39 (04) : 530 - 535
  • [25] New practical scoring system to predict post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: Development and validation
    Fujita, Koichi
    Yazumi, Shujiro
    Uza, Norimitsu
    Kurita, Akira
    Asada, Masanori
    Kodama, Yuzo
    Goto, Masashi
    Katayama, Toshiro
    Anami, Takahiro
    Watanabe, Akihiko
    Sugahara, Atsushi
    Mukai, Hidekazu
    Kawamura, Takashi
    JGH OPEN, 2021, 5 (09): : 1078 - 1084
  • [26] Prevalence and Factors Associated with Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis in Children
    Deng, Zhaohui
    Zeng, Jingqing
    Lv, Chan
    Jiang, Lirong
    Ji, Jianmei
    Li, Xingjia
    Hao, Lixiao
    Gong, Biao
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2021, 66 (01) : 224 - 230
  • [27] The effect of post-contrast washing on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis
    Okmen, Hasan
    Gurbulak, Bunyamin
    Duzkoylu, Yigit
    Gurbulak, Esin Kabul
    Pasaoglu, Esra
    Bektas, Hasan
    Buyukasik, Kenan
    Aren, Acar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (08): : 15868 - 15875
  • [28] Indomethacin for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis prophylaxis: Is it the magic bullet?
    Yang, Dennis
    Draganov, Peter V.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 18 (31) : 4082 - 4085
  • [29] Risks of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis After Liver Transplantation
    Ghambari, Kimia
    de Jong, David M.
    Bruno, Marco J.
    Polak, Wojciech G.
    van Driel, Lydi M. J. W.
    den Hoed, Caroline M.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 38 (07)
  • [30] Risk Factors and Risk Assessment for Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis
    Zhao, Chengjin
    Dai, Ting
    Qian, Junbo
    Ge, Zhenming
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2024, 34 (04): : 413 - 418