Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex for Treating Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: An Exploratory Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Double-Blind and Sham-Controlled Trials

被引:59
作者
Berlim, Marcelo T. [1 ,2 ]
Van den Eynde, Frederique [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Psychiat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Douglas Mental Hlth Univ Inst, Neuromodulat Res Clin, Montreal, PQ H4H 1R3, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE | 2014年 / 59卷 / 09期
关键词
posttraumatic stress disorder; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; meta-analysis; randomized controlled trials; efficacy; acceptability; COGNITIVE ABNORMALITIES; MAJOR DEPRESSION; RTMS; COMORBIDITY; ANXIETY; MEMORY; PREVALENCE; INVENTORY; MEDICINE; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1177/070674371405900905
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has yielded promising results as a treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, to date, no quantitative review of its clinical utility has been published. Method: We searched for randomized and sham-controlled trials from 1995 to March 2013 using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and SCOPUS. We then performed an exploratory random effects meta-analysis. Results: Studies on rTMS applied to the right DLPFC included 64 adults with PTSD. The pooled Hedges g effect size for pre and post changes in clinician-rated and self-reported PTSD symptoms were, respectively, 1.65 (P < 0.001) and 1.91 (P < 0.001), indicating significant and large-sized differences in outcome favouring active rTMS. Also, there were significant pre and post decreases with active rTMS in overall anxiety (Hedges g = 1.24; P = 0.02) and depressive (Hedges g = 0.85; P < 0.001) symptoms. Dropout rates at study end did not differ between active and sham rTMS groups. Regarding rTMS applied to the left DLPFC, there is only one study published to date (using a high frequency protocol), and its results showed that active rTMS seems to be superior overall to sham rTMS. Conclusions: Our exploratory meta-analysis shows that active rTMS applied to the DLPFC seems to be effective and acceptable for treating PTSD. However, the small number of subjects included in the analyses limits the generalizability of these findings. Future studies should include larger samples and deliver optimized stimulation parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 496
页数:10
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, HDB RES SYNTHESIS ME
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1993, Meta-analytic procedures for social research
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, INT STAT REV
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2012, EFFECT SIZES RES UNI
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1994, AM PSYCHIATR ASSOC
  • [6] AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION
    BECK, AT
    ERBAUGH, J
    WARD, CH
    MOCK, J
    MENDELSOHN, M
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) : 561 - &
  • [7] Response, remission and drop-out rates following high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials
    Berlim, M. T.
    van den Eynde, F.
    Tovar-Perdomo, S.
    Daskalakis, Z. J.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2014, 44 (02) : 225 - 239
  • [8] Blinding integrity in randomized sham-controlled trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Berlim, Marcelo T.
    Broadbent, Hannah J.
    Van den Eynde, Frederique
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 16 (05) : 1173 - 1181
  • [9] The physiological basis of transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Bestmann, Sven
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2008, 12 (03) : 81 - 83
  • [10] Post-traumatic stress disorder
    Bisson, Jonathan I.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7597): : 789 - 793