Questionnaires that measure the quality of relationships between patients and primary care providers: a systematic review

被引:11
|
作者
Ball, Lauren E. [1 ,2 ]
Barnes, Katelyn A. [2 ]
Crossland, Lisa [1 ]
Nicholson, Caroline [1 ]
Jackson, Claire [1 ]
机构
[1] UQ Mater Res Inst, Ctr Hlth Syst Reform & Integrat, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Menzies Hlth Inst Queensland, Parklands Dr, Gold Coast, Qld 4222, Australia
关键词
Continuity of care; General practice; Physician-patient relations; Primary care; Relationships; Survey; Therapeutic Alliance; Questionnaire; THERAPEUTIC ALLIANCE; EXPERIENCED CONTINUITY; VALIDATION; DEPTH; 1ST;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-018-3687-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundInternational guidance on models of care stress the importance of good quality, continuous patient-provider relationships to support high quality and efficient care and hospital avoidance. However, assessing the quality of patient-provider relationships is challenging due to its experiential nature. The aim of this study was to undertake a systematic review to identify questionnaires previously developed or used to assess the quality of continuous relationships between patients and their provider in primary care.MethodsMEDLINE, PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and SCOPUS databases were searched for English language studies published between 2009 and 2017. Key terms used identified studies conducted in the primary care setting examining relationships between patients and providers. Studies that focused on the conceptualisation, development, testing or review of a questionnaire, or studies that used a questionnaire for assessing the quality of continuous relationships between patients and providers were eligible. Studies that did not assess quality via a questionnaire, only assessed single aspects of relationships, only assessed single encounters, assessed transitions between settings or assessed relationships using an index were excluded. Information on validity testing of each relevant questionnaire identified from articles was reviewed to inform recommendations for future research and evaluation.ResultsTwenty-seven studies met the eligibility criteria, including 14 unique questionnaires. The questionnaires were diverse in length, scope, focus and level of validity testing. Five questionnaires were considered not feasible for future use due to size and lack of development work. Three questionnaires were considered strongest candidates for use in future work based on being relevant to the topic and primary care setting, freely available in English and not needing additional pilot work prior to use. These three questionnaires were the Care Continuity Across Levels of Care Scale, the Nijmegan Continuity Questionnaire and the Patient-Doctor Depth of Relationship Tool.ConclusionsThis study provides an overview of 14 unique questionnaires that have been used to assess the quality of continuous relationships between patients and primary care providers. The decision to use one of the questionnaires in future work requires careful consideration, including the scope, length, validation testing, accessibility of the questionnaires and their alignment with the initiative being evaluated.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Questionnaires that measure the quality of relationships between patients and primary care providers: a systematic review
    Lauren E. Ball
    Katelyn A. Barnes
    Lisa Crossland
    Caroline Nicholson
    Claire Jackson
    BMC Health Services Research, 18
  • [2] Electronic Consultation in Primary Care Between Providers and Patients: Systematic Review
    Mold, Freda
    Hendy, Jane
    Lai, Yi-Ling
    de Lusignan, Simon
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 7 (04) : 4 - 17
  • [3] Systematic review of measurement properties of questionnaires measuring somatization in primary care patients
    Sitnikova, Kate
    Dijkstra-Kersten, Sandra M. A.
    Mokkink, Lidwine B.
    Terluin, Berend
    van Marwijk, Harm W. J.
    Leone, Stephanie S.
    van der Horst, Henriette E.
    van der Wouden, Johannes C.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2017, 103 : 42 - 62
  • [4] Questionnaires of person centered care in primary care. A systematic review
    Pascual Lopez, Jose Antonio
    Gil Perez, Trinidad
    Sanchez Sanchez, Juan Antonio
    Menarguez Puche, Juan Francisco
    ATENCION PRIMARIA, 2020, 52 (10): : 738 - 749
  • [5] Patient satisfaction questionnaires for primary care out-of-hours services: a systematic review
    Garratt, Andrew M.
    Danielsen, Kirsten
    Hunskaar, Steinar
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2007, 57 (542) : 741 - 747
  • [6] Understanding the Relationships Between Health Care Providers' Moral Distress and Patients' Quality of Death
    Spence, Jeffrey
    Indovina, Kimberly A.
    Loresto, Figaro
    Eron, Kathryn
    Bailey, F. Amos
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 26 (07) : 900 - 906
  • [7] Quality of Relationships Between Residential Staff and Youth: A Systematic Review
    Pinheiro, Micaela
    Magalhaes, Eunice
    Calheiros, Maria Manuela
    Macdonald, Diana
    CHILD AND ADOLESCENT SOCIAL WORK JOURNAL, 2024, 41 (04) : 561 - 576
  • [8] A systematic review of quality measures used in primary care dentistry
    Byrne, Matthew J.
    Tickle, Martin
    Glenny, Anne-Marie
    Campbell, Stephen
    Goodwin, Tom
    O'Malley, Lucy
    INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL, 2019, 69 (04) : 252 - 264
  • [9] Screening questionnaires to identify problem drinking in the primary care setting: a systematic review
    Mueller G.
    Schumacher P.
    Wetzlmair J.
    Pallauf M.
    Journal of Public Health, 2016, 24 (1) : 9 - 19
  • [10] A systematic review of questionnaires measuring asthma control in children in a primary care population
    Bousema, Sara
    Bohnen, Arthur M.
    Bindels, Patrick J. E.
    Elshout, Gijs
    NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2023, 33 (01)