Effects of Care Leave and Family Social Policy: Spotlight on the United States

被引:4
作者
Freiberg, Tracey [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] New Sch, Milano Sch Policy Management & Environm, New York, NY 10011 USA
[2] St Johns Univ, Peter J Tobin Sch Business, Econ, Jamaica, NY 11439 USA
关键词
PARENTAL LEAVE; PAID; CALIFORNIA; IMPACT; GENDER; WORK;
D O I
10.1111/ajes.12293
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Consistent with Pope Francis's efforts to eradicate social exclusion, most countries in the world have already adopted care leave policies in an effort to reduce the conflict between being an employee and being a caregiver. Care leave policies allow workers time off for family or for self-care. Historically, care leave policies such as maternity leave are viewed as an employee benefit akin to short-term disability leave, providing job-protected time off for new mothers. This study reviews the literature of the short- and long-run economic and societal effects of care leave policies globally, with a specific focus on care leave policies in the United States. Care leave produces positive labor market and health outcomes, including increases in leave taking, improvement in replacement wages, improvements to profitability and employee morale, increases in female workforce participation and continuity, increases in birth weight, and decreases in infant mortality. Despite positive effects, labor market inequalities such as decreases in female labor market participation rates, gender wage gaps, and occupational segregation are often promoted by care leave policies. The conflicted findings in care leave research muddle the anticipated effects of paid care leave but allow room for alternative policy recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1037
页数:29
相关论文
共 58 条
[31]   Diffusion through Democracy [J].
Linos, Katerina .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 55 (03) :678-695
[32]   Family policies, wage structures, and gender gaps: Sources of earnings inequality in 20 countries [J].
Mandel, H ;
Semyonov, M .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2005, 70 (06) :949-967
[33]  
Manning A., 2003, Monopsony in Motion Imperfect Competition in Labor Markets
[34]  
Moss DavidA., 2004, When All Else Fails: Government as the Ultimate Risk-Manager
[35]  
Nataraj S, 1998, INT REV COM, V10, P197
[36]  
National Partnership for Women & Families, 2019, STAT PAID FAM MED LE
[37]  
Nunn R., 2017, The 51% Driving growth through women's economic participation, P19
[38]  
OECD, 2017, PF2 1 KEY CHAR PAR L
[39]   The Economic Consequences of Family Policies: Lessons from a Century of Legislation in High-Income Countries [J].
Olivetti, Claudia ;
Petrongolo, Barbara .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 31 (01) :205-230
[40]  
Rossin-Slater M., 2019, HLTH AFFAIRS HLTH PO, DOI [10.1377/hpb20190301.484936/full/, DOI 10.1377/HPB20190301.484936/FULL/]