Evaluation of shipyard selection criteria for shipowners using a fuzzy technique

被引:16
作者
Kafali, Mustafa [1 ]
Ozkok, Murat [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Naval Architecture & Marine Engn, Maslak, Turkey
[2] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Dept Naval Architecture & Marine Engn, Trabzon, Turkey
关键词
SUPPLIER SELECTION; AHP; MANAGEMENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/20464177.2015.1118787
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
There are various stages to the process of acquiring a vessel. First, a decision must be made on what vessel is needed. Next, an appropriate shipyard is selected; this decision is very significant, as it will determine the workmanship quality and delivery date of the vessel to be manufactured. From the point of view of a shipowner, receiving the vessel on time and manufactured to specification is crucial. From the point of view of the shipyard, it is vital to take as many orders as possible; therefore, one of the highest priorities of shipyards is to be the first choice for as many shipowners as possible in order to increase their requirement for steel fabrication and consequently their profits. In this study, the shipyard selection criteria for shipowners are presented and the degree of importance of each criterion is determined using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique. The aim of the study is to provide shipyards with information about the perspective of shipowners with regard to the shipyard selection process, thus allowing shipyards to strengthen their weaknesses and increase the number of shipowners which choose them to manufacture their ships.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 158
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Appl
[2]  
Badizadeh A., 2011, INDIAN J SCI TECHNOL, V4, P1749
[3]   Project selection through fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and a case study on Six Sigma implementation in an automotive industry [J].
Bilgen, Bilge ;
Sen, Mutlu .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2012, 23 (01) :2-25
[4]   Garage Location Selection for Public Transportation System in Istanbul: An Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy Axiomatic Design Based Approach [J].
Bilisik, Ozge Nalan ;
Demirtas, Nurgul ;
Tuzkaya, Umut Rifat ;
Baracli, Hayri .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2014,
[5]   FUZZY HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS [J].
BUCKLEY, JJ .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 17 (03) :233-247
[6]   Maritime policy development against ship flagging out dilemma using a fuzzy quantified SWOT analysis [J].
Celik, Metin ;
Kandakoglu, Ahmet .
MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2012, 39 (04) :401-421
[7]   Structuring fuzzy integrated multi-stages evaluation model on academic personnel recruitment in MET institutions [J].
Celik, Metin ;
Kandakoglu, Ahmet ;
Er, I. Deha .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (03) :6918-6927
[8]   Fuzzy axiomatic design-based performance evaluation model for docking facilities in shipbuilding industry: The case of Turkish shipyards [J].
Celik, Metin ;
Kahraman, Cengiz ;
Cebi, Selcuk ;
Er, I. Deha .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (01) :599-615
[9]   Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach [J].
Chan, Felix T. S. ;
Kumar, N. ;
Tiwari, M. K. ;
Lau, H. C. W. ;
Choy, K. L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2008, 46 (14) :3825-3857
[10]   Evaluating the criteria for human resource for science and technology (HRST) based on an integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEMATEL approach [J].
Chou, Ying-Chyi ;
Sun, Chia-Chi ;
Yen, Hsin-Yi .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2012, 12 (01) :64-71