Multi-state component criticality analysis for reliability improvement in multi-state systems

被引:72
作者
Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel
Colt, David W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] Stevens Inst Technol, Hoboken, NJ 07030 USA
关键词
importance measures; multi-state systems; reliability improvement;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2006.09.014
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates and implements composite importance measures (CIM) for multi-state systems with multi-state components (MSMC). Importance measures are frequently used as a means to evaluate and rank the impact and criticality of individual components within a system vet they are less often used as a guide to prioritize system reliability improvements. For multi-state systems. previously developed measures sometimes are not appropriate and they do not meet all user needs. This study has two inter-related goals: first, to distinguish between two types of importance measures that can be used for evaluating the criticality of components in MSMC with respect to multi-state system reliability, and second, based on the CIM, to develop a component allocation heuristic to maximize system reliability improvements. The heuristic uses Monte-Carlo simulation together with the max-flow min-cut algorithm as a means to compute component CIM. These measures are then transformed into a cost-based composite metric that guides the allocation of redundant elements into the existing system. Experimental results for different system complexities show that these new CIM can effectively estimate the criticality of components with respect to multi-state system reliability. Similarly, these results show that the CIM-based heuristic can be used as a fast and effective technique to guide system reliability improvements.(c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1608 / 1619
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   2 NEW COMPONENT IMPORTANCE MEASURES FOR A FLOW NETWORK SYSTEM [J].
AVEN, T ;
OSTEBO, R .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1986, 14 (01) :75-80
[2]  
Barlow R. E., 1978, Mathematics of Operations Research, V3, P275, DOI 10.1287/moor.3.4.275
[3]   State extension for adequacy evaluation of composite power systems-applications [J].
Billinton, R ;
Zhang, W .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2000, 15 (01) :427-432
[4]   MULTISTATE COHERENT SYSTEMS [J].
ELNEWEIHI, E ;
PROSCHAN, F ;
SETHURAMAN, J .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 1978, 15 (04) :675-688
[5]  
Elsayed E.A., 1996, RELIABILITY ENG
[6]   MULTISTATE RELIABILITY MODELS [J].
GRIFFITH, WS .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 1980, 17 (03) :735-744
[7]   Generalised importance measures for multi-state elements based on performance level restrictions [J].
Levitin, G ;
Podofillini, L ;
Zio, E .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2003, 82 (03) :287-298
[8]   Redundancy optimization for series-parallel multi state systems [J].
Levitin, G ;
Lisnianski, A ;
Ben-Haim, H ;
Elmakis, D .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1998, 47 (02) :165-172
[9]   Importance and sensitivity analysis of multi-state systems using the universal generating function method [J].
Levitin, G ;
Lisnianski, A .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1999, 65 (03) :271-282
[10]  
LEVITIN G, 2003, SERIES QUALITY RELIA, V6