Interventions to decrease the risk of adverse cardiac events for patients receiving chemotherapy and serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists: a systematic review

被引:7
作者
Tricco, Andrea C. [1 ]
Soobiah, Charlene [1 ]
Hui, Wing [1 ]
Antony, Jesmin [1 ]
Struchkov, Vladi [1 ]
Hutton, Brian [2 ]
Hemmelgarn, Brenda [3 ,4 ]
Moher, David [2 ]
Straus, Sharon E. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[2] Ottawa Civic Hosp, Ctr Practice Changing Res, Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Dept Geriatr Med, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
关键词
Serotonin receptor antagonists; Chemotherapy; Adverse events; Cardiac harm; Systematic review; Electrocardiogram; QT INTERVAL PROLONGATION; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA; EFFICACY; PALONOSETRON; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1186/2050-6511-16-1
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Patients may experience nausea and vomiting when undergoing chemotherapy or surgery requiring anesthesia. Serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists are effective antiemetics, yet may cause adverse cardiac events, such as arrhythmia. We aimed to identify interventions that mitigate the cardiac risk of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. Methods: Electronic databases, trial registries, and references were searched. Studies on patients undergoing chemotherapy or surgery examining interventions to monitor cardiac risk of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists were included. Search results were screened and data from relevant studies were abstracted in duplicate. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group's risk-of-bias tool. Due to a dearth of included studies, meta-analysis was not conducted. Results: Two randomized clinical trials (RCT) and 1 non-randomized clinical trial (NRCT) were included after screening 7,637 titles and abstracts and 1,554 full-text articles. Intravenous administration of different dolasetron doses was examined in the NRCT, while dolasetron versus ondansetron and palonosetron versus ondansetron were examined in the RCT. Electrocardiogram (ECG) was the only intervention examined to mitigate cardiac harm. No differences in ECG evaluations were observed between dolasetron or palonosetron versus ondansetron after 15 minutes, 24 hours, and 1 week post-administration in the 2 RCTs. Four deaths were observed in one RCT, which were deemed unrelated to palonosetron or ondansetron administration. Minor increases in PR and QT intervals were observed in the NRCT for dolasetron dosages greater than 1.2 mg/kg 1-2 hours post-administration, but were deemed not clinically relevant. Conclusions: ECG monitoring of chemotherapy patients administered with 5-HT3 receptor antagonists did not reveal clinically significant differences in arrhythmia between the medications at the examined time periods. The usefulness of ECG to monitor chemotherapy patients administered with 5-HT3 receptor antagonists remains unclear, as all patients received ECG monitoring.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], BOOK DEV MCHARM QUAL
  • [2] A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting -: Conclusions from cross-validations between two centers
    Apfel, CC
    Läärä, E
    Koivuranta, M
    Greim, CA
    Roewer, N
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (03) : 693 - 700
  • [3] The effects of ondansetron and granisetron on electrocardiography in children receiving chemotherapy for acute leukemia
    Buyukavci, M
    Olgun, H
    Ceviz, N
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 28 (02): : 201 - 204
  • [4] Long-term Outcomes in Individuals With Prolonged PR Interval or First-Degree Atrioventricular Block
    Cheng, Susan
    Keyes, Michelle J.
    Larson, Martin G.
    McCabe, Elizabeth L.
    Newton-Cheh, Christopher
    Levy, Daniel
    Benjamin, Emelia J.
    Vasan, Ramachandran S.
    Wang, Thomas J.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 301 (24): : 2571 - 2577
  • [5] Palonosetron improves prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a double-blind randomized phase III trial comparing single doses of palonosetron with ondansetron
    Gralla, R
    Lichinitser, M
    Van der Vegt, S
    Sleeboom, H
    Mezger, J
    Peschel, C
    Tonini, G
    Labianca, R
    Macciocchi, A
    Aapro, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 (10) : 1570 - 1577
  • [6] Dose-ranging evaluation of the antiemetic efficacy of intravenous dolasetron in patients receiving chemotherapy with doxorubicin or cyclophosphamide
    Hesketh, PJ
    Gandara, DR
    Hesketh, AM
    Facada, A
    Perez, EA
    Webber, LM
    Martin, LA
    Cramer, MB
    Hahne, WF
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 1996, 4 (02) : 141 - 146
  • [7] Comparative efficacy and safety of palonosetron with the first 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis
    Jin, Y.
    Sun, W.
    Gu, D.
    Yang, J.
    Xu, Z.
    Chen, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2013, 22 (01) : 41 - 50
  • [8] Kim Jin-Soo, 2004, Cancer Res Treat, V36, P372, DOI 10.4143/crt.2004.36.6.372
  • [9] Evaluation of drug-induced QT interval prolongation - Implications for drug approval and labelling
    Malik, M
    Camm, AJ
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2001, 24 (05) : 323 - 351
  • [10] Moher D, 2009, PLOS MED, V6, DOI [10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299, 10.1136/bmj.b2535]