Why professors ignore cheating: Opinions of a national sample of psychology instructors

被引:58
作者
Keith-Spiegel, P [1 ]
Tabachnick, BG
Whitley, BE
Washburn, J
机构
[1] Ball State Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, Muncie, IN 47306 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Northridge, Dept Psychol, Northridge, CA 91330 USA
关键词
ethics and teaching; cheating;
D O I
10.1207/s15327019eb0803_3
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
To understand better why evidence of student cheating is often ignored, a national sample of psychology instructors was sampled for their opinions. The 127 respondents overwhelmingly agreed that dealing with instances of academic dishonesty was among the most onerous aspects of their profession. Respondents cited insufficient evidence that cheating has occurred as the most frequent reason for overlooking student behavior or writing that might be dishonest. A factor analysis revealed 4 other clusters of reasons as to why cheating may be ignored, Emotional reasons included stress and lack of courage. Difficult reasons included the extensive time and effort required to deal with cheating students. Fear reasons included concern about retaliation or a legal challenge. Denial reasons included beliefs that cheating students would fail anyway and that the worst offenders do not get caught. The reasons why instances of academic dishonesty should be proactively confronted are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 227
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1985, PROJ RED MEAN PURP B
[2]  
[Anonymous], NASPA J
[3]  
BENTLER PM, 1998, EOS STRUCTURAL EQUAT
[4]  
COLLISON M, 1990, CHRONICLE HIGHE 0117, pA33
[5]  
CORRENTI R, 1986, ISSUES PERSPECTIVES
[6]  
DAVIS K, 1992, ENGL J, V81, P72
[7]  
Gehring D., 1994, ISSUES PERSPECTIVES
[8]  
Gehring D., 1986, ISSUES PERSPECTIVES
[9]  
GRAHAM MA, 1994, J COLL STUDENT DEV, V35, P255
[10]  
JENDREK MP, 1992, J COLL STUDENT DEV, V33, P260