A Modified Bowel Preparation Regimen for Colonoscopy Providing the Patients' Satisfaction and Convenience

被引:5
作者
Wen, Chia-Cheng [1 ]
Jao, Shu-Wen [1 ]
Hsiao, Cheng-Wen [1 ]
机构
[1] Triserv Gen Hosp, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Dept Surg, Natl Def Med Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2017年 / 23卷
关键词
Colonoscopy; Laxatives; Patient Satisfaction; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; EARLY REPEAT COLONOSCOPY; POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL; SODIUM-PHOSPHATE; QUALITY; METAANALYSIS; IMPACT; SAFETY; EFFICACY; TOLERANCE;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.905431
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: A complete cleansing of the bowel is a critical factor that impacts the diagnostic accuracy of colonoscopies. However, the common bowel preparation regimen of two 45 mL doses of sodium phosphate (2xNaP) often leads to uncomfortable symptoms and subsequently lower patient adherence. To improve patient adherence and satisfaction, we proposed a modified regimen composed of two sennoside tablets and one bottle of NaP (S+NaP) and we then evaluated bowel preparation quality and patient satisfaction. Material/Methods: A total of 531 patients who underwent colonoscopies at the outpatient coloproctology clinic from January 2016 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Eligible patients were divided into two groups: S+NaP group (n=93) and 2xNaP group (n=60). We compared bowel preparation quality, adenoma detection rate (ADR), self-reported patient satisfaction scores, and adverse events among the two groups. Results: Regarding high bowel preparation quality, our results showed that there was no significant difference among the two groups (p=0.775), as well as no significant differences in ADRs (p=0.187). However, a lower proportion of nausea was found in the S+NaP group compared to the 2xNaP group (24.7% versus 41.7%, respectively, p=0.028). In addition, patients in the S+NaP group were more likely to be very satisfied with the regimen compared with patients in the 2xNaP group (odds ratio: 5.58; 95% confidence interval: 2.36-13.213, p<0.001). Conclusions: Our modified bowel preparation regimen, S+NaP, yielded significantly higher patient satisfaction with less nausea while maintaining similar bowel preparation quality.
引用
收藏
页码:3123 / 3129
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, CANC REG REP
[2]   Safety, efficacy, and patient tolerance of a three-dose regimen of orally administered aqueous sodium phosphate for colonic cleansing before colonoscopy [J].
Barclay, RL .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (04) :527-533
[3]   Bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy: A continual search for excellence [J].
Bechtold, Matthew L. ;
Choudhary, Abhishek .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (02) :155-157
[4]   Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy [J].
Belsey, J. ;
Epstein, O. ;
Heresbach, D. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 25 (04) :373-384
[5]   Sodium phosphate versus polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy bowel preparation: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Cheng, Ji ;
Tao, Kaixiong ;
Shuai, Xiaoming ;
Gao, Jinbo .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (09) :4033-4041
[6]   Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy - Timing is the key! [J].
Church, JM .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1998, 41 (10) :1223-1225
[7]   High-quality Bowel Preparation Is Required for Detection of Sessile Serrated Polyps [J].
Clark, Brian T. ;
Laine, Loren .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 14 (08) :1155-1162
[8]   What Level of Bowel Prep Quality Requires Early Repeat Colonoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Preparation Quality on Adenoma Detection Rate [J].
Clark, Brian T. ;
Rustagi, Tarun ;
Laine, Loren .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 109 (11) :1714-1723
[9]   Safety issues regarding colonic cleansing for diagnostic and surgical procedures [J].
Clark, LE ;
DiPalma, JA .
DRUG SAFETY, 2004, 27 (15) :1235-1242
[10]   Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study [J].
Froehlich, F ;
Wietlisbach, V ;
Gonvers, JJ ;
Burnand, B ;
Vader, JP .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (03) :378-384