Magee Equation 3 predicts pathologic response to neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy in estrogen receptor positive, HER2 negative/equivocal breast tumors

被引:34
作者
Farrugia, Daniel J. [1 ,5 ]
Landmann, Alessandra [1 ,6 ]
Zhu, Li [2 ]
Diego, Emilia J. [1 ]
Johnson, Ronald R. [1 ]
Bonaventura, Marguerite [1 ]
Soran, Atilla [1 ]
Dabbs, David J. [3 ]
Clark, Beth Z. [3 ]
Puhalla, Shannon L. [4 ]
Jankowitz, Rachel C. [4 ]
Brufsky, Adam M. [4 ]
Lembersky, Barry C. [4 ]
Ahrendt, Gretchen M. [1 ]
McAuliffe, Priscilla F. [1 ]
Bhargava, Rohit [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Div Breast & Gynecol Pathol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[5] Centegra Hlth Syst, Centegra Comprehens Breast Program, Crystal Lake, IL USA
[6] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Oklahoma City, OK USA
关键词
ONCOTYPE DX; RECURRENCE SCORE; PROGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION; PROGESTERONE-RECEPTOR; CANCER BURDEN; SURVIVAL; TRASTUZUMAB; LAPATINIB; TAMOXIFEN; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1038/modpathol.2017.41
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Magee Equations were derived as an inexpensive, rapid alternative to Oncotype DX. The Magee Equation 3 utilizes immunohistochemical and FISH data for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2 and Ki-67 for its calculation (24.30812+ERIHC x (-0.02177)+PRIHC x (-0.02884)+(0 for HER2 negative, 1.46495 for equivocal, 12.75525 for HER2 positive)+ Ki-67 x 0.18649). We hypothesize that Magee Equation 3 scores from pre-therapy core biopsy can predict response to neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. A prospectively-maintained database of patients who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy from 2010 to 2014 at a single institution was retrospectively reviewed. Pathologic complete response was defined as absence of invasive tumor in the breast and regional lymph nodes. Of the 614 cases, tumors with missing immunohistochemical results and those that were ER negative or HER2 positive were excluded. This resulted in 237 ER positive, HER2 negative/equivocal tumors that formed the basis of this study. Magee Equation 3 scores were divided into 3 categories similar to Oncotype DX, ie, 0 to <18 (low), 18 to <31 (intermediate), and 31 or higher (high) scores. The pathologic complete response rate for low, intermediate and high Magee Equation 3 scores was 0%, 4%, and 36%, respectively. Patients with high Magee Equation 3 scores were 13 times more likely to achieve pathologic complete response compared to those with Magee Equation 3 scores less than 31 (95% CI 5.09-32.87, P<0.0001). For patients that did not achieve pathologic complete response, high Magee Equation 3 correlated with higher recurrence rate, with the majority occurring in patients with positive lymph nodes in the resection specimen. Magee Equation 3 score >= 31 predicts pathologic complete response in the neoadjuvant setting and for tumor recurrence, when pathologic complete response is not achieved. These results show the utility of Magee Equation 3 in predicting patients who will benefit from chemotherapy but warrant prospective multi-institutional validation.
引用
收藏
页码:1078 / 1085
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   A mitotically active, cellular tumor stroma and/or inflammatory cells associated with tumor cells may contribute to intermediate or high Oncotype DX Recurrence Scores in low-grade invasive breast carcinomas [J].
Acs, Geza ;
Esposito, Nicole N. ;
Kiluk, John ;
Loftus, Loretta ;
Laronga, Christine .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2012, 25 (04) :556-566
[2]   Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial [J].
Albain, Kathy S. ;
Barlow, William E. ;
Shak, Steven ;
Hortobagyi, Gabriel N. ;
Livingston, Robert B. ;
Yeh, I-Tien ;
Ravdin, Peter ;
Bugarini, Roberto ;
Boehner, Frederick L. ;
Davidson, Nancy E. ;
Sledge, George W. ;
Winer, Eric P. ;
Hudis, Clifford ;
Ingle, James N. ;
Perez, Edith A. ;
Pritchard, Kathleen I. ;
Shepherd, Lois ;
Gralow, Julie R. ;
Yoshizawa, Carl ;
Allred, D. Craig ;
Osborne, C. Kent ;
Hayes, Daniel F. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2010, 11 (01) :55-65
[3]   Routine pathologic parameters can predict Oncotype DXTM recurrence scores in subsets of ER positive patients: who does not always need testing? [J].
Allison, K. H. ;
Kandalaft, P. L. ;
Sitlani, C. M. ;
Dintzis, S. M. ;
Gown, A. M. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 131 (02) :413-424
[4]  
Auerbach J, 2010, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V134, P1697, DOI 10.1043/2009-0439-OAR.1
[5]   The triple negative paradox: Primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes [J].
Carey, Lisa A. ;
Dees, E. Claire ;
Sawyer, Lynda ;
Gatti, Lisa ;
Moore, Dominic T. ;
Collichio, Frances ;
Ollila, David W. ;
Sartor, Carolyn I. ;
Graham, Mark L. ;
Perou, Charles M. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (08) :2329-2334
[6]  
CARTER CL, 1989, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V63, P181, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-H
[8]   A new prognostic classification after primary chemotherapy for breast cancer: Residual disease in breast and nodes (RDBN) [J].
Chollet, Philippe ;
Abrial, Catherine ;
Durando, Xavier ;
Thivat, Emilie ;
Tacca, Olivier ;
Mouret-Reynier, Marie-Ange ;
Leheurteur, Marianne ;
Kwiatkowski, Fabrice ;
Dauplat, Jacques ;
Penault-Llorca, Frederique .
CANCER JOURNAL, 2008, 14 (02) :128-132
[9]   Prognostic and predictive factors in early-stage breast cancer [J].
Cianfrocca, M ;
Goldstein, LJ .
ONCOLOGIST, 2004, 9 (06) :606-616
[10]   Interobserver Agreement Among Pathologists for Semiquantitative Hormone Receptor Scoring in Breast Carcinoma [J].
Cohen, David A. ;
Dabbs, David J. ;
Cooper, Kristine L. ;
Amin, Milon ;
Jones, Terrell E. ;
Jones, Mirka W. ;
Chivukula, Mamatha ;
Trucco, Giuliana A. ;
Bhargava, Rohit .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2012, 138 (06) :796-802