Prediction of deposition bead geometry in wire arc additive manufacturing using machine learning

被引:26
作者
Oh, Won -Jung [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Choon-Man [2 ]
Kim, Dong-Hyeon [3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst Ind Technol KITECH, Adv Forming Proc R&D Grp, 40 Techno saneop ro 29beon gil, Ulsan, South Korea
[2] Changwon Natl Univ, Dept Mech Engn, 20 Changwondaehak ro, Changwon si 51140, Gyeongsangnam d, South Korea
[3] Changwon Natl Univ, Mechatron Res Ctr, 20, Changwondaehak ro, Changwon si 51140, Gyeongsangnam d, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T | 2022年 / 20卷
关键词
Additive manufacturing; Wire arc additive manufacturing; Machine learning; Support vector machine; Bead geometry optimization; PARAMETERS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.08.154
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The deposition bead geometry in the arc strike zone is often abnormal compared with that in the middle deposition zone. The accumulation of these errors in the deposition process results in defects in the overall geometry of the deposition bead. To prevent the accu-mulation of such errors, this study aimed to address the irregular deposition bead shape and deviation of the deposition bead geometry in the arc strike zone without changing the deposition path or introducing external devices. A support vector machine classifier, which is a typical application of machine-learning classification models, was used to obtain the deposition condition ranges for a uniform deposition bead shape. The deposition condi-tions of the arc strike and middle deposition zones that could reduce the deviation of the deposition bead geometry in the arc strike zone were obtained using support vector ma-chine regression. These conditions were applied in the form of variable conditions in single-path deposition. Five-layer deposition was conducted to validate the regression model. As a result of the validation experiment, the average height and width errors in the arc strike zone were 0.36% and 1.28%, respectively, and the average height and width errors in the middle deposition zone were 0.64% and 1.26%, respectively. Therefore, the regres-sion model can be used for accurate deposition, thereby reducing the post-processing cost.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:4283 / 4296
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[2]  
Anguita D, 2010, IEEE IJCNN
[3]   A machine learning approach for the prediction of melting efficiency in wire arc additive manufacturing [J].
Barrionuevo, German O. ;
Sequeira-Almeida, Pedro M. ;
Rios, Sergio ;
Ramos-Grez, Jorge A. ;
Williams, Stewart W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 120 (5-6) :3123-3133
[4]   Wire based additive layer manufacturing: Comparison of microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V components fabricated by laser-beam deposition and shaped metal deposition [J].
Baufeld, Bernd ;
Brandl, Erhard ;
van der Biest, Omer .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 211 (06) :1146-1158
[5]  
Boser B. E., 1992, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, P144, DOI 10.1145/130385.130401
[6]   3D heat transfer, fluid flow and electromagnetic model for cold metal transfer wire arc additive manufacturing (Cmt-Waam) [J].
Cadiou, S. ;
Courtois, M. ;
Carin, M. ;
Berckmans, W. ;
Le Masson, P. .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 36
[7]   Modelling gas metal arc weld geometry using artificial neural network technology [J].
Chan, B ;
Pacey, J ;
Bibby, M .
CANADIAN METALLURGICAL QUARTERLY, 1999, 38 (01) :43-51
[8]   Machine Learning Approach for the Prediction of Defect Characteristics in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing [J].
Cheepu, Muralimohan .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE INDIAN INSTITUTE OF METALS, 2023, 76 (02) :447-455
[9]   Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression [J].
Cherkassky, V ;
Ma, YQ .
NEURAL NETWORKS, 2004, 17 (01) :113-126
[10]   Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) process of nickel based superalloys - A review [J].
Dhinakaran, V. ;
Ajith, J. ;
Fahmidha, A. Fathima Yasin ;
Jagadeesha, T. ;
Sathish, T. ;
Stalin, B. .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 21 :920-925