Responses to antipsychotic therapy among patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and either predominant or prominent negative symptoms

被引:33
作者
Stauffer, Virginia L. [1 ]
Song, Guochen [2 ]
Kinon, Bruce J. [1 ]
Ascher-Svanum, Haya [1 ]
Chen, Lei [1 ]
Feldman, Peter D. [1 ]
Conley, Robert R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Corp Ctr, Lilly Res Labs, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[2] I3 Clin Data Serv, Cary, NC 27513 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
Deficit syndrome; Negative symptoms; Olanzapine; Quetiapine; Treatment response; DOUBLE-BLIND; POSITIVE SYMPTOMS; CLINICAL-TRIAL; RATING-SCALE; DEFICIT; HALOPERIDOL; RISPERIDONE; OLANZAPINE; QUETIAPINE; CLOZAPINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.schres.2011.09.028
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Patients with schizophrenia who have predominant negative symptoms are often considered less responsive to treatment. This analysis of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder compares changes in symptom severity between those with predominant versus merely prominent negative symptoms. Prominent negative symptoms were defined by a baseline score of >= 4 on at least 3, or >= 5 on at least 2, of the 7 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative subscale items. Predominant negative symptoms were defined by the foregoing plus a PANSS positive score of <19, a Barnes Akathisia score of <2, a Simpson-Angus score of <4, and a Calgary Depressive Scale score of <9. Adult patients with schizophrenia (n=227) or schizoaffective disorder (n=116) received either olanzapine (10-20 mg/day, n=169) or quetiapine (300-700 mg/day, n=174) for up to 24 weeks. Data for both medications were pooled. Of the 343 patients enrolled in the study, 34.7% met the criteria for predominant negative symptoms, the remaining 653% being characterized only by their prominent negative symptoms. Changes in the severity of negative symptoms in both patient types largely followed similar trajectories during treatment, as reflected both in Marder PANSS negative subscale scores and in the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms total and domain scores. Patients with either predominant or prominent negative symptoms therefore appear to respond similarly to atypical antipsychotic treatment. This distinction, incorporating an evaluation of the presence of positive, affective, and extrapyramidal symptoms, may therefore not have prognostic implications for the responsiveness of patients' negative symptoms to treatment. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 201
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF A DEPRESSION RATING-SCALE FOR SCHIZOPHRENICS [J].
ADDINGTON, D ;
ADDINGTON, J ;
MATICKATYNDALE, E ;
JOYCE, J .
SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 1992, 6 (03) :201-208
[2]  
Alphs L, 2007, PSYCHOPHARMACOL BULL, V40, P41
[3]  
ANDREASEN NC, 1989, BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, VOL 155, SUPP NO. 7, P49
[4]   DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS OF AMPHETAMINE AND NEUROLEPTICS ON NEGATIVE VS POSITIVE SYMPTOMS IN SCHIZOPHRENIA [J].
ANGRIST, B ;
ROTROSEN, J ;
GERSHON, S .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1980, 72 (01) :17-19
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FORCE DSM 4 DSM 4 T, DOI 10.1176/dsm10.1176/appi.books.9780890420249.dsm-iv-tr
[6]   The deficit syndrome in schizophrenia: implications for the treatment of negative symptoms [J].
Arango, C ;
Buchanan, RW ;
Kirkpatrick, B ;
Carpenter, WT .
EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 19 (01) :21-26
[7]   A RATING-SCALE FOR DRUG-INDUCED AKATHISIA [J].
BARNES, TRE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1989, 154 :672-676
[8]  
BREIER A, 1987, AM J PSYCHIAT, V144, P1549
[9]  
Buchanan RW, 1998, AM J PSYCHIAT, V155, P751
[10]  
CARPENTER WT, 1988, AM J PSYCHIAT, V145, P578