Post-Disaster Recovery Monitoring with Google Earth Engine

被引:27
|
作者
Ghaffarian, Saman [1 ]
Rezaie Farhadabad, Ali
Kerle, Norman [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Dept Earth Syst Anal ESA, Fac Geoinformat Sci & Earth Observat ITC, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 13期
关键词
disaster; damage; recovery; monitoring; assessment; remote sensing; satellite imagery; Landsat; Google Earth Engine; Typhoon Haiyan; cloud computing; RANDOM FOREST; CROPLAND EXTENT; VEGETATION; CLASSIFICATION; ALGORITHM; IMAGERY; PROXIES; DAMAGE; INDEX; GIS;
D O I
10.3390/app10134574
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Post-disaster recovery is a complex process in terms of measuring its progress after a disaster and understanding its components and influencing factors. During this process, disaster planners and governments need reliable information to make decisions towards building the affected region back to normal (pre-disaster), or even improved, conditions. Hence, it is essential to use methods to understand the dynamics/variables of the post-disaster recovery process, and rapid and cost-effective data and tools to monitor the process. Google Earth Engine (GEE) provides free access to vast amounts of remote sensing (RS) data and a powerful computing environment in a cloud platform, making it an attractive tool to analyze earth surface data. In this study we assessed the suitability of GEE to analyze and track recovery. To do so, we employed GEE to assess the recovery process over a three-year period after Typhoon Haiyan, which struck Leyte island, in the Philippines, in 2013. We developed an approach to (i) generate cloud and shadow-free image composites from Landsat 7 and 8 satellite imagery and produce land cover classification data using the Random Forest method, and (ii) generate damage and recovery maps based on post-classification change analysis. The method produced land cover maps with accuracies >88%. We used the model to produce damage and three time-step recovery maps for 62 municipalities on Leyte island. The results showed that most of the municipalities had recovered after three years in terms of returning to the pre-disaster situation based on the selected land cover change analysis. However, more analysis (e.g., functional assessment) based on detailed data (e.g., land use maps) is needed to evaluate the more complex and subtle socio-economic aspects of the recovery. The study showed that GEE has good potential for monitoring the recovery process for extensive regions. However, the most important limitation is the lack of very-high-resolution RS data that are critical to assess the process in detail, in particular in complex urban environments.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Developing indicators to measure post-disaster community recovery in the United States
    Horney, Jennifer
    Dwyer, Caroline
    Aminto, Meghan
    Berke, Philip
    Smith, Gavin
    DISASTERS, 2017, 41 (01) : 124 - 149
  • [22] (Re)adaptation of urban space in post-disaster recovery
    Urmi Sengupta
    URBAN DESIGN International, 2023, 28 : 152 - 167
  • [23] (Re)adaptation of urban space in post-disaster recovery
    Sengupta, Urmi
    URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 28 (02) : 152 - 167
  • [24] Conceptualising Post-Disaster Recovery: Incorporating Grief Experiences
    Harms, Louise
    Block, Karen
    Gallagher, H. Colin
    Gibbs, Lisa
    Bryant, Richard A.
    Lusher, Dean
    Richardson, John
    MacDougall, Colin
    Baker, Elyse
    Sinnott, Vikki
    Ireton, Greg
    Forbes, David
    Kellett, Connie
    Waters, Elizabeth
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2015, 45 : 170 - 187
  • [25] Post-disaster recovery sequencing strategy for road networks
    Gokalp, Can
    Patil, Priyadarshan N.
    Boyles, Stephen D.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2021, 153 : 228 - 245
  • [26] Progress and Trends in the Application of Google Earth and Google Earth Engine
    Zhao, Qiang
    Yu, Le
    Li, Xuecao
    Peng, Dailiang
    Zhang, Yongguang
    Gong, Peng
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (18)
  • [27] CataEx: A multi-task export tool for the Google Earth Engine data catalog
    Domej, Gisela
    Pluta, Kacper
    Ewertowski, Marek
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2025, 183
  • [28] What is going on within google earth engine? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Perez-Cutillas, Pedro
    Perez-Navarro, Alberto
    Conesa-Garcia, Carmelo
    Zema, Demetrio Antonio
    Amado-Alvarez, Jesus Pilar
    REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS-SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 29
  • [29] Google Earth Engine Framework for Satellite Data-Driven Wildfire Monitoring in Ukraine
    Yailymov, Bohdan
    Shelestov, Andrii
    Yailymova, Hanna
    Shumilo, Leonid
    FIRE-SWITZERLAND, 2023, 6 (11):
  • [30] Impact of flagship projects on the recovery of a city post-disaster
    Rodrigo, Niransha
    Wilkinson, Suzanne
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 58