AI strategy of India: policy framework, adoption challenges and actions for government

被引:59
作者
Chatterjee, Sheshadri [1 ]
机构
[1] IIT Delhi, Dept Management Studies, New Delhi, India
关键词
AI; Government; India; Policy; Regulation; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.1108/TG-05-2019-0031
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study is to provide recommendations for policy framework on artificial intelligence (AI) in India. Design/methodology/approach Studies have been conducted through focus group discussion and the other sources such as different company websites using AI, Indian Government strategy reports on AI, literature studies, different policies implemented on AI in different locations and other relevant documents. After those studies, a charter of recommendation has been provided. This will help the authority to frame the AI policy for India. Findings This study highlights that "National Strategy for AI" for India needs improvement to provide comprehensive inputs for framing policy on AI. This study also implies that focus is to be given on security, privacy issues including issues of governance. Research limitations/implications AI-related technology has immense potential toward the development of organizations. This study implies the necessity of framing a comprehensive policy on AI for India. If there is a comprehensive policy on AI for India, the Indian industries will derive many benefits. Practical implications This study provides inputs on how the industries of India can be benefitted with the help of AI and how R&D can develop the AI activities to harness maximum benefits from this innovative technology. Social implications AI-related policy will have appreciable influence on the society in terms of human-device interactions and communications. The policy framework on AI for India is expected to project far-reaching effects toward deriving benefits to the society. Originality/value This paper has taken a holistic and unique attempt to provide inputs to the policymakers for framing a comprehensive and meaningful policy on AI for India.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 775
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] AI Technologies for Delivering Government Services to Citizens: Benefits and Challenges
    Mohamad, Ibrahim
    Hughes, Laurie
    Dwivedi, Yogesh K.
    Alalwan, Ali Abdallah
    ROLE OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN SHAPING THE POST-PANDEMIC WORLD, 2022, 13454 : 38 - 57
  • [32] Analyzing the Relationship between Agricultural AI Adoption and Government-Subsidized Insurance
    Osorio, Chad Patrick
    Leucci, Francesca
    Porrini, Donatella
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (10):
  • [33] Adoption of artificial intelligence in financial services: a policy framework
    Kumari, Bharti
    Kaur, Jaspreet
    Swami, Sanjeev
    JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY MANAGEMENT, 2024, 15 (02) : 396 - 417
  • [34] Challenges to the Omohundro-Bostrom framework for AI motivations
    Haggstrom, Olle
    FORESIGHT, 2019, 21 (01): : 153 - 166
  • [35] Issues and challenges in recruitment for government doctors in Gujarat, India
    Bhaskar Purohit
    Tim Martineau
    Human Resources for Health, 14
  • [36] Issues and challenges in recruitment for government doctors in Gujarat, India
    Purohit, Bhaskar
    Martineau, Tim
    HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH, 2016, 14
  • [37] Factors influencing e-government adoption in India: a qualitative approach
    Kumar, Rajiv
    Sachan, Amit
    Mukherjee, Arindam
    Kumar, Ritu
    DIGITAL POLICY REGULATION AND GOVERNANCE, 2018, 20 (05) : 413 - 433
  • [38] Promoting e-mobility in India: challenges, framework, and future roadmap
    Kumar Shalender
    Rajesh Kumar Yadav
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2018, 20 : 2587 - 2607
  • [39] E-government adoption among employees in India: A qualitative approach
    Bhaskar P.
    Vinay M.
    Joshi A.
    Bhaskar, Preeti (preeti.bhaskar52@gmail.com), 1600, Inderscience Publishers (12): : 95 - 118
  • [40] Asymmetric Open Government Data (OGD) framework in India
    Saxena, Stuti
    DIGITAL POLICY REGULATION AND GOVERNANCE, 2018, 20 (05) : 434 - 448