Liquidity, liquidity risk, and information flow: Lessons from an emerging market

被引:6
作者
Tissaoui, Kais [3 ]
Ftiti, Zied [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] EDC Paris Business Sch, OCRE Lab, Paris, France
[2] Univ Tunis, High Business Inst Management, GEF Lab 2A, Tunis, Tunisia
[3] El Manar Univ, Int Finance Grp, Fac Management & Econ Sci Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
关键词
Information flow; GARCH models; Trading volume; Order imbalance; Liquidity risk; Liquidity; CONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY; ORDER IMBALANCE; VOLUME; VOLATILITY; RETURN; IMPACT; EFFICIENCY; VARIANCE; PRICES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.09.028
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper examines the role of public and private information flows in intraday liquidity and intraday liquidity risk in the Tunisian stock market. Our empirical results are based on ARMA and GARCH-type models and show that, for major Tunisian stocks, gradually elapsed public information together with gradually elapsed private information in the market is the dominant factor in liquidity improvements in the Tunisian stock market. Liquidity improvements are generated by a decrease in the bid-ask spread accompanied by an increase in the depth at best limit. Our results clearly indicate that the arrival of public information in a sequential manner is the dominant factor generating increases in liquidity risk related to the bid-ask spread, while the advent of private information in a contemporaneous manner is the dominant factor generating increases in liquidity risk related to the depth at best limit. Additionally, our results show that liquidity risk persistence disappears when trading volume and order imbalance are included as explanatory variables in the conditional variance equation. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 48
页数:21
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Asset pricing with liquidity risk [J].
Acharya, VV ;
Pedersen, LH .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 77 (02) :375-410
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT RES J FINANCE EC
[4]  
BAGEHOT W, 1971, FINANCIAL ANAL J, V8, P31
[5]   GENERALIZED AUTOREGRESSIVE CONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY [J].
BOLLERSLEV, T .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1986, 31 (03) :307-327
[6]  
Box G. E., 2016, Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, V5th
[7]  
Brockman P., 2002, Journal of Financial Research, VXXV, P521, DOI [10.1111/1475-6803.00035, DOI 10.1111/1475-6803.00035]
[8]   Liquidity risk and institutional ownership [J].
Cao, Charles ;
Petrasek, Lubomir .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2014, 21 :76-97
[9]  
Chai D., 2010, International Review of Financial Analysis, V19, P181, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.IRFA.2010.02.005
[10]   Trade size, order imbalance, and the volatility-volume relation [J].
Chan, K ;
Fong, WM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 57 (02) :247-273