Eating behaviour and its association with social living conditions and weight status among adolescent girls: results of the cross-sectional Berlin School Children's Cohort study

被引:7
作者
Bau, Anne-Madeleine [1 ]
Krull, Sarah [2 ]
Ernert, Andrea [3 ]
Babitsch, Birgit [2 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Inst Expt Pediat Endocrinol, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[2] Berlin Sch Publ Hlth, Master Program, Berlin, Germany
[3] Charite, Inst Biostat & Clin Epidemiol, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Adolescent girls; Food frequency score; Meal structure score; Portion size score; Social status; Weight status; Parents; GERMAN HEALTH INTERVIEW; HOME FOOD ENVIRONMENT; OPTIMIZED MIXED DIET; BODY-MASS INDEX; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; PREVENTIVE NUTRITION; INTAKE PATTERNS; OVERWEIGHT; OBESITY; CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1017/S1368980011000541
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To capture a more holistic picture of eating behaviour by investigating the impact of the social living conditions and weight status of parents and daughters on food consumption frequency, the context of meals and daily portion sizes. Design: Cross-sectional Berlin School Children's Cohort study. Setting: A total of sixty-nine schools in Berlin (3 400 000 inhabitants, eastern Germany) participated in the present study. Subjects: A total of 1519 girls aged 11-14 years were selected. Bi- and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the impact of age, migration background, socio-economic status (SES), parental education, family situation and the weight status of parents and daughters on three different eating behaviour scores according to nutritional recommendations. Results: For the three dependent eating behaviour variables, different patterns of influencing factors emerged. Multivariate regression (model 1) revealed that low and middle SES, two-parent migration background and older age were significant risk factors. Meal context was also significantly influenced by living with a single parent. Similar results were obtained for the daily portion size scores and maternal overweight status was the most influential. Model 2 succeeded in showing that, within the composite variable of family SES, mothers' level of education was the dominant component. Conclusions: SES as a whole, and especially the component of mothers' level of education and two-parent migration background, was the strongest risk factor for an unfavourable eating pattern among adolescent girls. The results clearly indicated preventive potential. Using three different measures of eating behaviour simultaneously provided an in-depth understanding of general patterns and potential risk factors.
引用
收藏
页码:1759 / 1767
页数:9
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Alexy U, 2002, BRIT J NUTR, V87, P595, DOI 10.1079/BJNBJN/2002572
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Global database on body mass index
[3]   Is there a further acceleration in the age at onset of menarche? A cross-sectional study in 1840 school children focusing on age and bodyweight at the onset of menarche [J].
Bau, A. M. ;
Ernert, A. ;
Schenk, L. ;
Wiegand, S. ;
Martus, P. ;
Grueters, A. ;
Krude, H. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2009, 160 (01) :107-113
[4]  
Bau AM, 2003, ERNAHRUNGS-UMSCHAU, V50, P214
[5]   Longitudinal study of skipping breakfast and weight change in adolescents [J].
Berkey, CS ;
Rockett, HRH ;
Gillman, MW ;
Field, AE ;
Colditz, GA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2003, 27 (10) :1258-1266
[6]  
BETTGE S, 2008, GESUNDHEITSBERICHTER
[7]   Family environmental factors influencing the developing behavioral controls of food intake and childhood overweight [J].
Birch, LL ;
Davison, KK .
PEDIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 48 (04) :893-+
[8]   Associations between the home food environment and obesity-promoting eating behaviors in adolescence [J].
Campbell, Karen J. ;
Crawford, David A. ;
Salmon, Jo ;
Carver, Alison ;
Garnett, Sarah P. ;
Baur, Louise A. .
OBESITY, 2007, 15 (03) :719-730
[9]  
Chin Y. S., 2009, Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, V8, P425
[10]   Familial concordance of dietary fat practices and intake [J].
Cullen, KW ;
Lara, KM ;
de Moor, C .
FAMILY & COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2002, 25 (02) :65-75