Model reduction of aerobic bioprocess models for efficient simulation

被引:8
|
作者
Duan, Zhaoyang [1 ]
Wilms, Terrance [2 ]
Neubauer, Peter [3 ]
Kravaris, Costas [1 ]
Bournazou, Mariano Nicolas Cruz [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Artie McFerrin Dept Chem Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Dept Proc Engn, Chair Measurement & Control, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Biotechnol, Dept Bioproc Engn, D-13355 Berlin, Germany
[4] DataHow AG, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Model reduction; Dissolved oxygen tension; Aerobic; Nonlinear dynamics; Observer; NONLINEAR OBSERVER DESIGN; SINGULAR PERTURBATIONS; INVARIANT-MANIFOLDS; STATE ESTIMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ces.2020.115512
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Owing to the increasing demand for large scale and high efficiency in manufacturing processes, computer aided tools for process operation and control are rapidly gaining popularity. An important state variable in aerobic processes is the dissolved oxygen, which can be easily measured online and is an important indicator of the metabolic activity. However, due to the fast kinetics of the oxygen transfer, dynamical models describing aerobic bioprocesses tend to be highly stiff. This can lead to significant numerical problems hampering its use for fixed step discretization methods and computationally costly applications such as computer fluid dynamics. In this work we use the slow-motion invariant manifold and the quasi steady state assumption methods to eliminate the differential equation describing the dissolved oxygen (the fast mode). By doing this, the tractability of the model is significantly increased with a neglectable loss in description power. The reduced model is also useful for simplifying the observer design problems, which is demonstrated by a state and parameter estimation example at the end of the work. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An efficient 'a priori' model reduction for boundary element models
    Ryckelynck, D
    Hermanns, L
    Chinesta, F
    Alarcón, E
    ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS, 2005, 29 (08) : 796 - 801
  • [2] PROGRESS IN CHARACTERIZATION, MODELING AND CONTROL OF AEROBIC BIOPROCESS PART II. AEROBIC BIOPROCESS MODELING AND CONTROL
    Caramihai, Mihai
    Dumitrache, Ioan
    Chirvase, Ana Aurelia
    REVUE ROUMAINE DE CHIMIE, 2009, 54 (08) : 619 - +
  • [3] Soft sensor assisted dynamic bioprocess control: Efficient tools for bioprocess development
    Sagmeister, Patrick
    Wechselberger, Patrick
    Jazini, Mohammadhadi
    Meitz, Andrea
    Langemann, Timo
    Herwig, Christoph
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2013, 96 : 190 - 198
  • [4] Model Reduction for Identification of ARX Models
    Wang, Jianhong
    Yong-hong, Zhu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2012 24TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC), 2012, : 2093 - 2098
  • [5] On the Use of Functional Models in Model Reduction
    Fuhrmann, Paul A.
    Helmke, Uwe
    PERSPECTIVES IN MATHEMATICAL SYSTEM THEORY, CONTROL, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2010, 398 : 177 - +
  • [6] Model reduction for prediction in regression models
    Helland, IS
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2000, 27 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [7] A highly efficient method for structural model reduction
    Yang, Qiu Wei
    Peng, Xi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2023, 124 (02) : 513 - 533
  • [8] A CONTINUATION METHOD FOR THE EFFICIENT SOLUTION OF PARAMETRIC OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS IN KINETIC MODEL REDUCTION
    Lebiedz, Dirk
    Siehr, Jochen
    SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2013, 35 (03) : A1584 - A1603
  • [9] LINEARIZATION AND MODEL REDUCTION OF CONTACT DYNAMICS SIMULATION
    Liang, Jianxun
    Ma, Ou
    Liu, Caishan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME DYNAMIC SYSTEMS AND CONTROL CONFERENCE AND BATH/ASME SYMPOSIUM ON FLUID POWER AND MOTION CONTROL (DSCC 2011), VOL 1, 2012, : 541 - 548
  • [10] Model reduction and process analysis of biological models
    Casagranda, Stefano
    Ropers, Delphine
    Gouze, Jean-Luc
    2015 23RD MEDITERRANEAN CONFERENCE ON CONTROL AND AUTOMATION (MED), 2015, : 1132 - 1139