Spinal Cord Stimulation via Percutaneous and Open Implantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Examining Complication Rates

被引:29
作者
Blackburn, Amy Z. [1 ]
Chang, Hunter H. [2 ]
DiSilvestro, Kevin [3 ]
Veeramani, Ashwin [4 ]
McDonald, Christopher [3 ]
Zhang, Andrew S. [3 ]
Daniels, Alan [3 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Math, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[3] Brown Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Univ Orthoped, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[4] Brown Univ, Div Appl Math, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
Chronic pain; Complex regional pain syndrome; Complications; Failed back surgery syndrome; Meta-analysis; Spinal cord stimulation; Systematic review; BACK SURGERY SYNDROME; REGIONAL PAIN SYNDROME; SYNDROME TYPE-I; HIGH-FREQUENCY; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; DOUBLE-BLIND; LEG PAIN; PADDLE ELECTRODES; FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.077
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has become a successful ther-apeutic option for combating chronic pain and can be implanted via percutaneous or open (laminotomy/laminectomy) techniques. This study aimed to systematically review the complications that occur after SCS placement via percutaneous and open (laminotomy/laminectomy) in failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), and chronic back (lumbosacral)/leg pain. METHODS: The PubMed and Embase databases were searched from incep-tion to June 2020; prospective studies using SCS in patients with FBSS, CRPS, and chronic low back pain that reported both complications and the implanta-tion method used were included. Effects and results from each study were combined using a random-effects model and were structured for subgroup analysis between open implantation and percutaneous implantation. Meta-regression was performed by calculating a mean difference and weighted by inverse variance and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Thirty-two articles were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Using several different patient-and event-based metrics, our meta-analysis revealed an overall average complication rate of 21.1% (95% CI, 14.9e27.2). Equipment, technical, and medical complications occurred at rates of 12.1%, 1.1%, and 6.3%, respectively. Lead migration and infection rates were 5.6% and 3.8%, respectively. When comparing the 2 implant techniques, medical-related surgical reinterventions and explants due to infection were more com-mon in open compared with percutaneous SCS procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Equipment-related complications accounted for the majority of SCS complications. Percutaneous SCS resulted in less reintervention and fewer explants caused by medical-related complications and infection, respectively. These conclusions may provide a general understanding of the SCS complications profile for physicians who care for SCS patients.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in Surgery-Naive PatientsA Prospective Single-Center Study
    Ahmadi, Sebastian A.
    Vesper, Jan
    Schu, Stefan
    Slotty, Philipp J.
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2017, 20 (04): : 348 - 353
  • [2] Prospective, Randomized, Sham-Control, Double Blind, Crossover Trial of Subthreshold Spinal Cord Stimulation at Various Kilohertz Frequencies in Subjects Suffering From Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (SCS Frequency Study)
    Al-Kaisy, Adnan
    Palmisani, Stefano
    Pang, David
    Sanderson, Karen
    Wesley, Samuel
    Tan, Ye
    McCammon, Sheryl
    Trescott, Andrea
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2018, 21 (05): : 457 - 465
  • [3] Computer assisted and patient interactive programming of dual octrode spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of chronic pain
    Alo, KM
    Yland, MJ
    Kramer, DL
    Charnov, JH
    Redko, V
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 1998, 1 (01): : 30 - 45
  • [4] Epidural spinal cord stimulation with a multiple electrode paddle lead is effective in treating intractable low back pain
    Barolat, G
    Oakley, JC
    Law, JD
    North, RB
    Ketcik, B
    Sharan, A
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2001, 4 (02): : 59 - 66
  • [5] Barolat G, 2004, SEMIN NEUROSURG, V15, P151
  • [6] Is Spinal Cord Stimulation Safe? A Review of its Complications
    Bendersky, Damian
    Yampolsky, Claudio
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 82 (06) : 1359 - 1368
  • [7] Benyamin R, 2020, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V23, P87
  • [8] High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain: Pre-Clinical Overview and Systematic Review of Controlled Trials
    Bicket, Mark C.
    Dunn, Roger Y.
    Ahmed, Shihab U.
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (12) : 2326 - 2336
  • [9] Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review
    Cameron, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2004, 100 (03) : 254 - 267
  • [10] Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Review
    Compton, Aaron K.
    Shah, Binit
    Hayek, Salim M.
    [J]. CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2012, 16 (01) : 35 - 42