Economic well-being of rural farm households in Ghana: A perspective of inequality and polarisation

被引:6
作者
Lu, Wencong [1 ]
Horlu, Godwin Seyram Agbemavor [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Management, Zi Jin Gang Campus, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Economic well-being; Polarisation; Inequality; Rural farmers; Ghana; INCOME POLARIZATION; NONFARM INCOME; POVERTY REDUCTION; LAND-USE; GROWTH; AFRICA; LINKS; INTENSIFICATION; PRODUCTIVITY; LIVELIHOODS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.013
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This paper investigates economic well-being of rural farm households in Ghana from the perspective of inequality and polarisation, using data from the Ghana Living Standard Survey rounds 5 and 6, and within the framework of disparities in ecological locations, farm size holdings and the main occupation of household heads. It also examines sources of income polarisation and inequality and their implications for poverty distribution among the rural farmers. The results show that distribution of the major crops cultivated generally vary across the farmer categories. Also, biases exist in income distribution among the farmers. The main source of inequality and polarisation is the differences within the individual categories of farmers, however, with respect to the ecological locations, between-group differences is the main source of polarisation. We find that greater proportion of the poorer farmers are found in the savannah zones, as well as among the smallholders and where household heads are engaged in self-employed agricultural activities. Contrarily, large-scale producers, farmers in forest areas, and where farm household heads are in public and private sector jobs are richer. Generally, poverty is concentrated within the farmer categories that incur higher polarisation and inequality indices and have also contributed the greatest to the total inequality and polarisation, whereas the categories that incur the lowest of the indices and have contributed the least to the total indices are wealthier. These findings suggest inequality and polarisation should be mitigated in tandem, and targeting the categories harbouring larger proportions of poorer farmers can reduce poverty more effectively. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 262
页数:15
相关论文
共 88 条
[2]  
Addai K. N., 2014, Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, V3, P149
[3]   Poverty profile and correlates of poverty in Ghana [J].
Adjasi, Charles ;
Osei, Kofi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 34 (07) :449-+
[4]   Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: The Bonferroni vs Holm methods [J].
Aickin, M ;
Gensler, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1996, 86 (05) :726-728
[5]  
Alemu B. A., 2009, Agricultural Journal, V4, P202
[6]   INEQUALITY AND DEVELOPMENT - A CRITIQUE [J].
ANAND, S ;
KANBUR, SMR .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 1993, 41 (01) :19-43
[7]   Spatial inequality and household poverty in Ghana [J].
Annim, Samuel Kobina ;
Mariwah, Simon ;
Sebu, Joshua .
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, 2012, 36 (04) :487-505
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2005, GROWTH POV RED ROL A
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Ghana Living Standards Survey Round 5 (GLSS 5): Poverty profile in Ghana (2005-2007)
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2014, GHANA LIVING STANDAR