Enteral nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nutritional status of patients: Five-year prospective study

被引:30
作者
Erdil, A [1 ]
Saka, M [1 ]
Ates, Y [1 ]
Tuzun, A [1 ]
Bagci, S [1 ]
Uygun, A [1 ]
Yesilova, Z [1 ]
Gulsen, M [1 ]
Karaeren, N [1 ]
Dagalp, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Dept Gastroenterol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
enteral feeding; percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy;
D O I
10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03892.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Since it was described in 1980, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has been a widely used method for insertion of a gastrostomy tube in patients who are unable to swallow or maintain adequate nutrition. The aim of the present paper was to determine the complications of PEG insertion and to study pre- and post-procedural nutritional status. Methods: During the period of March 1999-September 2004, placement of PEG tube was performed in 85 patients (22 women and 63 men). Patient nutritional status was assessed before and after PEG insertion via anthropometric measurements. Results: The most frequent indication for PEG insertion was neurological disorders (65.9%). Thirty patients died due to primary disease and two patients due to PEG-related complications within 5 years. There were 14 early complications in 10 patients (15.2%; < 30 days), and 18 late complications in 12 patients (19.6%). Total mortality was 37.6%. All complications other than four were minor. Before PEG insertion, patients were assessed with subjective global assessment and it was determined that 43.2% of them had severe, and 41.9% of them had mild malnutrition. After PEG insertion, significant improvements on patient nutrition levels was observed. Conclusion: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is a minimally invasive gastrostomy method with low morbidity and mortality rates, is easy to follow up and easy to replace when clogged. (C) 2005 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1002 / 1007
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Akcan Y, 1999, TURKIYE KLIN GASTROE, V10, P23
[2]   Cross-sectional and prospective studies of nutritional indices after percutaneous gastrostomy [J].
Bannerman, E ;
Phillips, F ;
Pendlebury, J ;
Ghosh, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 13 (11) :1315-1321
[3]  
BASKIN WN, 1992, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V87, P1547
[4]   SAFETY OF EARLY FEEDING AFTER PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY [J].
BROWN, DN ;
MIEDEMA, BW ;
KING, PD ;
MARSHALL, JB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 21 (04) :330-331
[5]   Insertion, efficacy, and removal of a nonendoscopically removable percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube [J].
Cass, OW ;
Rowland, K ;
Bartram, B ;
Ross, JR ;
Choe, Y ;
Hall, JD .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1999, 13 (05) :516-519
[6]   Complications and outcome of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in different patient groups [J].
Chowdhury, MA ;
Batey, R .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 1996, 11 (09) :835-839
[7]   Long-term management of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy by a nutritional support team [J].
Cortez-Pinto, H ;
Correia, AP ;
Camilo, ME ;
Tavares, L ;
De Moura, MC .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2002, 21 (01) :27-31
[8]  
Dormann AJ, 1999, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V94, P3220, DOI 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01523.x
[9]   GASTROSTOMY WITHOUT LAPAROTOMY - A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC TECHNIQUE [J].
GAUDERER, MWL ;
PONSKY, JL ;
IZANT, RJ .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1980, 15 (06) :872-875
[10]   COMPARISON OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY WITH STAMM GASTROSTOMY [J].
GRANT, JP .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1988, 207 (05) :598-603