Accelerated mix proportioning of concrete incorporated with supplementary cementitious materials

被引:0
|
作者
Chaitanya, A. [1 ]
Rao, B. Kameswara [2 ]
Madhuri, P. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Deemed Univ, Koneru Lakshmaiah Educ Fdn, Civil Engn Dept, Guntur 522502, Andhra Pradesh, India
[2] Deemed Univ, Koneru Lakshmaiah Educ Fdn, Guntur 522502, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
Accelerated technique; Correlation; Fly ash; GGBS; Silica fume; Water-binder proportion;
D O I
10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.302
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The accelerated mix modelling approach is a powerful tool for producing high-performance characteristics in young concrete. Since rapid concrete curing accelerates the cement hydration process, the critical portion of the strength is achieved in a fraction of the time it would usually require 28 days under conventional curing conditions. There is no suggestion that Ground Granulated Blast Furnace slag, Silica fume or fly ash was used in the 1980 s . So far, only plain concrete has a connection in the accelerated mix design process. The accelerated curing method was used in this study with a combination of GGBS, fly ash, and silica fume, as well as two different water-binder ratios of 0.3 and 0.4, and by applying 5% silica fume to cement weight, concentrations of GGBS and fly ash as high as 70%, 60% and 50% can be achieved. Normal laboratory size cubes (150 x150 x150mm) were compressed and tested to achieve the goals of this analysis. Compressive strength, impact of GGBS rate and impact of water-concrete proportion were used to improve the consistency of blended concrete with accelerated curing method. This analysis will determine correlations between the boiling water strength and for 28 days, 56 days and 90 days strength of concrete with GGBS, fly ash and Silica fume. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the International Conference on Sustainable materials, Manufacturing and Renewable Technologies 2021.
引用
收藏
页码:5117 / 5120
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Proposed Mix Design of Concrete with Supplementary Cementitious Materials by Packing Density Method
    Badrinarayan Rath
    Shirish Deo
    Gangadhar Ramtekkar
    Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 2020, 44 : 615 - 629
  • [2] Mixture Proportioning Approach for Low-CO2 Concrete Using Supplementary Cementitious Materials
    Yang, Keun-Hyeok
    Tae, Sung-Ho
    Choi, Dong-Uk
    ACI MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2016, 113 (04) : 533 - 542
  • [3] A Proposed Mix Design of Concrete with Supplementary Cementitious Materials by Packing Density Method
    Rath, Badrinarayan
    Deo, Shirish
    Ramtekkar, Gangadhar
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 44 (02) : 615 - 629
  • [4] Concrete mix proportioning
    National Council for Cement and Building Materials
    不详
    不详
    Indian Concr J, 2006, 12 (23-26):
  • [5] A unified approach for mix design of concrete containing supplementary cementitious materials based on reactivity moduli
    Xie, T.
    Visintin, P.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 203 : 68 - 82
  • [6] Residual mechanical properties of concrete incorporated with nano supplementary cementitious materials exposed to elevated temperature
    Tiwary, Aditya Kumar
    Singh, Harpreet
    Eldin, Sayed M.
    Ilyas, R. A.
    NANOTECHNOLOGY REVIEWS, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [7] The influence of supplementary cementitious materials on concrete properties
    Sekar, Deepika
    Udhayakumar, Kiran Raj Balakrishnan
    Dyson, Charles
    Karuppusamy, Manickaraj
    Natarajan, Sivakumar
    Annamalai, Kumar
    MATERIA-RIO DE JANEIRO, 2025, 30
  • [8] PROGRESSIVE CONCRETE MIX PROPORTIONING
    DAY, KW
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE, 1986, 83 (02): : 318 - 320
  • [9] Mix proportioning of geopolymer concrete
    Rao, G. Mallikarjuna
    Rao, T. D. Gunneswara
    Seshu, Rama D.
    Venkatesh, A.
    CEMENT WAPNO BETON, 2016, 21 (04): : 274 - +
  • [10] PROGRESSIVE CONCRETE MIX PROPORTIONING
    HOPE, BB
    HEWITT, PM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE, 1985, 82 (03): : 350 - 356