Understanding the challenges to implementing case management for people with dementia in primary care in England: a qualitative study using Normalization Process Theory

被引:43
作者
Bamford, Claire [1 ]
Poole, Marie [1 ]
Brittain, Katie [1 ]
Chew-Graham, Carolyn [2 ]
Fox, Chris [3 ]
Iliffe, Steve [4 ]
Manthorpe, Jill [5 ]
Robinson, Louise [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AX, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Keele Univ, Res Inst Primary Care & Hlth Sci, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[3] Univ E Anglia, Norwich Med Sch, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[4] UCL, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, London NW3 2PF, England
[5] Kings Coll London, Social Care Workforce Res Unit, London WC2R 2LS, England
关键词
Dementia; Case management; Patients; Carers; Primary care; Normalization Process Theory; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; UK PRIMARY-CARE; COLLABORATIVE CARE; COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS; DEPRESSION; PROGRAMS; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-014-0549-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Case management has been suggested as a way of improving the quality and cost-effectiveness of support for people with dementia. In this study we adapted and implemented a successful United States' model of case management in primary care in England. The results are reported elsewhere, but a key finding was that little case management took place. This paper reports the findings of the process evaluation which used Normalization Process Theory to understand the barriers to implementation. Methods: Ethnographic methods were used to explore the views and experiences of case management. Interviews with 49 stakeholders (patients, carers, case managers, health and social care professionals) were supplemented with observation of case managers during meetings and initial assessments with patients. Transcripts and field notes were analysed initially using the constant comparative approach and emerging themes were then mapped onto the framework of Normalization Process Theory. Results: The primary focus during implementation was on the case managers as isolated individuals, with little attention being paid to the social or organizational context within which they worked. Barriers relating to each of the four main constructs of Normalization Process Theory were identified, with a lack of clarity over the scope and boundaries of the intervention (coherence); variable investment in the intervention (cognitive participation); a lack of resources, skills and training to deliver case management (collective action); and limited reflection and feedback on the case manager role (reflexive monitoring). Conclusions: Despite the intuitive appeal of case management to all stakeholders, there were multiple barriers to implementation in primary care in England including: difficulties in embedding case managers within existing well-established community networks; the challenges of protecting time for case management; and case managers' inability to identify, and act on, emerging patient and carer needs (an essential, but previously unrecognised, training need). In the light of these barriers it is unclear whether primary care is the most appropriate setting for case management in England. The process evaluation highlights key aspects of implementation and training to be addressed in future studies of case management for dementia.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, IMPR SERV SUPP PEOPL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ALZHEIMERS DIS INT
[3]  
[Anonymous], HLTH TECHNOL ASSESS
[4]   Effectiveness of collaborative care for older adults with Alzheimer disease in primary care - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Callahan, CM ;
Boustani, MA ;
Unverzagt, FW ;
Austrom, MG ;
Damush, TM ;
Perkins, AJ ;
Fultz, BA ;
Hui, SL ;
Counsell, SR ;
Hendrie, HC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (18) :2148-2157
[5]  
CHALLIS D., 2002, CARE MANAGEMENT SOCI
[6]   The UP-TECH project, an intervention to support caregivers of Alzheimer's disease patients in Italy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [J].
Chiatti, Carlos ;
Masera, Filippo ;
Rimland, Joseph M. ;
Cherubini, Antonio ;
Scarpino, Osvaldo ;
Spazzafumo, Liana ;
Lattanzio, Fabrizia ;
Baldassarri, Diletta ;
Bitti, Luigina ;
Carosi, Aurora ;
Sabbatini, Maila ;
Paolasini, Elisabetta ;
Fiori, Tania ;
Fronzi, Cinzia ;
Giacchetta, Simona ;
Giacomini, Valeria ;
Giovagnoli, Laura ;
Lattanzi, Giuli ;
Manca, Anna Maria ;
Marinelli, Ida ;
Pigini, Valeria ;
Pignotti, Marina ;
Proietti, Maria Chiara ;
Quarticelli, Antonia ;
Rovedi, Martina ;
Tasso, Letizia ;
Valeri, Valentina ;
Antonioli, Andrea ;
Barabucci, Mariella ;
Bassani, Mara ;
Bollettini, Paola ;
Bruttapasta, M. Cristina ;
Buccolini, Carla ;
Carangella, Rosa ;
Carboni, Franca ;
Ceccolini, Daniela ;
D'Incecco, Patrizia ;
Di Felice, Mariangela ;
Dini, Lara ;
Gioia, Giordano ;
Di Prima, Giuseppe ;
Giusepponi, Giancarlo ;
Lanciotti, Cesarina ;
Loffreda, Alessia ;
Luciani, Oriana ;
Mariani, Laura ;
Mastrorilli, Francesco ;
Moroni, Roberto ;
Piatkowska, Izabela ;
Rucoli, Roberta .
TRIALS, 2013, 14
[7]   Outcomes for patients with dementia from the Cleveland Alzheimer's Managed Care Demonstration [J].
Clark, PA ;
Bass, DM ;
Looman, WJ ;
McCarthy, CA ;
Eckert, S .
AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2004, 8 (01) :40-51
[8]   Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory [J].
Coupe, Nia ;
Anderson, Emma ;
Gask, Linda ;
Sykes, Paul ;
Richards, David A. ;
Chew-Graham, Carolyn .
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2014, 15
[9]   Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance [J].
Craig, Peter ;
Dieppe, Paul ;
Macintyre, Sally ;
Michie, Susan ;
Nazareth, Irwin ;
Petticrew, Mark .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7676) :979-983
[10]  
Department of Health, 2009, LIV DEM NAT DEM STAT