Evaluation of the three-nucleon analyzing power puzzle

被引:24
作者
Tornow, W [1 ]
Witala, H
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Phys, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Triangle Univ Nucl Lab, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[3] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Phys, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00233-4
中图分类号
O57 [原子核物理学、高能物理学];
学科分类号
070202 ;
摘要
The current status of the three-nucleon analyzing power puzzle is reviewed. Applying tight constraints on the allowed deviations between calculated predictions and accepted values for relevant nucleon-nucleon observables reveals that energy independent correction factors applied to the P-3(j) nucleon-nucleon interactions can not solve the puzzle. Furthermore, using the same constraints, charge-independence breaking in the P-3(j) nucleon-nucleon interactions can be ruled out as a possible tool to improve the agreement between three-nucleon calculations and data. The study of the energy dependence of the three-nucleon analyzing power puzzle gives clear evidence that the P-3(j) nucleon-nucleon interaction obtained from phase-shift analyses and used in potential models are correct above about 25 MeV, i.e., the P-3(j) nucleon-nucleon interactions have to be modified only at lower energies in order to solve the three-nucleon analyzing power puzzle, unless new three-nucleon forces can be found that account for the three-nucleon analyzing power puzzle without destroying the beautiful agreement between rigorous three-nucleon calculations and a large body of accurate three-nucleon data. (C) 1998 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 292
页数:13
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BRUNE CR, IN PRESS PHYS LETT
[2]  
GLOCKLE W, 1990, NUCL PHYS A, V508, pC115, DOI 10.1016/0375-9474(90)90468-2
[3]   The three-nucleon continuum: Achievements, challenges and applications [J].
Glockle, W ;
Witala, H ;
Huber, D ;
Kamada, H ;
Golak, J .
PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 1996, 274 (3-4) :107-285
[4]   Critical comparison of experimental data and theoretical predictions for N-d scattering below the breakup threshold [J].
Kievsky, A ;
Rosati, S ;
Tornow, W ;
Viviani, M .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 1996, 607 (04) :402-424
[5]   CROSS-SECTION, POLARIZATION OBSERVABLES, AND PHASE-SHIFT PARAMETERS IN P-D AND N-D ELASTIC-SCATTERING [J].
KIEVSKY, A ;
VIVIANI, M ;
ROSATI, S .
PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 1995, 52 (01) :R15-R19
[6]   PARAMETRIZATION OF THE PARIS N-N POTENTIAL [J].
LACOMBE, M ;
LOISEAU, B ;
RICHARD, JM ;
MAU, RV ;
COTE, J ;
PIRES, P ;
TOURREIL, RD .
PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 1980, 21 (03) :861-873
[7]  
MACHLEIDT R, 1989, ADV NUCL PHYS, V19, P189
[8]   ANALYZING POWERS OF P+D SCATTERING BELOW THE DEUTERON BREAKUP THRESHOLD [J].
SHIMIZU, S ;
SAGARA, K ;
NAKAMURA, H ;
MAEDA, K ;
MIWA, T ;
NISHIMORI, N ;
UENO, S ;
NAKASHIMA, T ;
MORINOBU, S .
PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 1995, 52 (03) :1193-1202
[9]   PARTIAL-WAVE ANALYSIS OF ALL NUCLEON-NUCLEON-SCATTERING DATA BELOW 350 MEV [J].
STOKS, VGJ ;
KLOMP, RAM ;
RENTMEESTER, MCM ;
DESWART, JJ .
PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 1993, 48 (02) :792-815
[10]  
TOMOTAKE MEM, 1992, J ADV ZOOL, V13, P1