Are teachers literate in formative assessment? The development and validation of the Teacher Formative Assessment Literacy Scale

被引:23
作者
Yan, Zi [1 ,3 ]
Pastore, Serafina [2 ]
机构
[1] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Bari, Dept Res & Humanities Innovat, Bari, Italy
[3] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, 10 Lo Ping Rd, Hong Kong, NT, Peoples R China
关键词
Formativeassessment; Formativeassessmentliteracy; Scaledevelopment; Validation; Teacherprofessionaldevelopment; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; FIT INDEXES; RASCH MODEL; CLASSROOM; INSTRUMENT; CONCEPTIONS; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101183
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Despite the critical role of formative assessment in instruction, there is a lack of theory-driven instruments that specifically assess teachers' formative assessment literacy. This paper reports the development and validation of the Teacher Formative Assessment Literacy Scale (TFALS). The instrument was developed on a three-dimensional model of formative assessment, aiming at assessing the conceptual, practical, and socio-emotional aspects of formative assessment literacy. Survey data were collected from 585 teachers in Hong Kong primary and sec-ondary schools. Exploratory factor analysis suggests a three-factor structure, and confirmatory factor analysis supports this structure. Rasch analysis results further support its scale dimensionality and item quality. In addition, the relations between TFALS scores and teachers' formative assessment practices demonstrate the in-strument's external validity. Overall, the results suggest that the TFALS is an appropriate instrument for assessing teachers' formative assessment literacy. The potential of using the TFALS in research and practice is discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 84 条
[51]  
Linacre John M, 2002, J Appl Meas, V3, P85
[52]   Reconceptualising the role of teachers as assessors: teacher assessment identity [J].
Looney, Anne ;
Cumming, Joy ;
van Der Kleij, Fabienne ;
Harris, Karen .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2018, 25 (05) :442-467
[53]   An instrument to audit teachers' use of assessment for learning [J].
Lysaght, Zita ;
O'Leary, Michael .
IRISH EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 2013, 32 (02) :217-232
[54]  
Mandinach E. B., 2016, DATA LIT TEACHERS MA
[55]  
Mayo S.T., 1967, Pre-service preparation of teachers in educational measurement
[56]   Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses [J].
McDonald, RP ;
Ho, MHR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2002, 7 (01) :64-82
[57]  
Mertler C., 2005, MEASURING TEACHERSKN
[58]  
Mertler C.A., 2003, ANN M MIDWESTERN ED
[59]   VALIDITY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL-ASSESSMENT - VALIDATION OF INFERENCES FROM PERSONS RESPONSES AND PERFORMANCES AS SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY INTO SCORE MEANING [J].
MESSICK, S .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1995, 50 (09) :741-749
[60]   Teacher assessment literacy: A three-dimensional model [J].
Pastore, Serafina ;
Andrade, Heidi L. .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2019, 84 :128-138