Are teachers literate in formative assessment? The development and validation of the Teacher Formative Assessment Literacy Scale

被引:23
作者
Yan, Zi [1 ,3 ]
Pastore, Serafina [2 ]
机构
[1] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Bari, Dept Res & Humanities Innovat, Bari, Italy
[3] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, 10 Lo Ping Rd, Hong Kong, NT, Peoples R China
关键词
Formativeassessment; Formativeassessmentliteracy; Scaledevelopment; Validation; Teacherprofessionaldevelopment; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; FIT INDEXES; RASCH MODEL; CLASSROOM; INSTRUMENT; CONCEPTIONS; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101183
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Despite the critical role of formative assessment in instruction, there is a lack of theory-driven instruments that specifically assess teachers' formative assessment literacy. This paper reports the development and validation of the Teacher Formative Assessment Literacy Scale (TFALS). The instrument was developed on a three-dimensional model of formative assessment, aiming at assessing the conceptual, practical, and socio-emotional aspects of formative assessment literacy. Survey data were collected from 585 teachers in Hong Kong primary and sec-ondary schools. Exploratory factor analysis suggests a three-factor structure, and confirmatory factor analysis supports this structure. Rasch analysis results further support its scale dimensionality and item quality. In addition, the relations between TFALS scores and teachers' formative assessment practices demonstrate the in-strument's external validity. Overall, the results suggest that the TFALS is an appropriate instrument for assessing teachers' formative assessment literacy. The potential of using the TFALS in research and practice is discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model [J].
Adams, RJ ;
Wilson, M ;
Wang, WC .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1997, 21 (01) :1-23
[2]   The construction of the teacher as expert assessor [J].
Adie, Lenore ;
Stobart, Gordon ;
Cumming, Joy .
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2020, 48 (04) :436-453
[3]  
AFT American Federation of Teachers National Council on Measurement in Education & National Education Association NCME & NEA & NEA, 1990, STAND TEACH COMP ED
[4]   Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling [J].
Allison, PD .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 112 (04) :545-557
[5]   PREDICTING THE PERFORMANCE OF MEASURES IN A CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS WITH A PRETEST ASSESSMENT OF THEIR SUBSTANTIVE VALIDITIES [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 76 (05) :732-740
[6]  
Andrade H., 2010, HDB FORMATIVE ASSESS
[7]  
Andrade H.L., 2018, Using formative assessment to enhance learning, achievement, and academic self-regulation
[8]   Controversy and the Rasch model - A characteristic of incompatible paradigms? [J].
Andrich, D .
MEDICAL CARE, 2004, 42 (01) :7-16
[9]   Exploring formative assessment in primary school classrooms: Developing a framework of actions and strategies [J].
Antoniou, Panayiotis ;
James, Mary .
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2014, 26 (02) :153-176
[10]   Formative assessment: a critical review [J].
Bennett, Randy .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2011, 18 (01) :5-25