Subgroup analyses of clinical effectiveness to support health technology assessments

被引:13
作者
Paget, Marie-Ange [1 ]
Chuang-Stein, Christy [2 ]
Fletcher, Christine [3 ]
Reid, Carol [4 ]
机构
[1] Eli Lilly, Suresnes, France
[2] Pfizer Inc, Kalamazoo, MI USA
[3] Amgen Ltd, Cambridge, England
[4] Roche, Welwyn Garden City, Herts, England
关键词
subgroup; health technology assessment; heterogeneity; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZING PLATELET INHIBITION; ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES; PRASUGREL-THROMBOLYSIS; THERAPEUTIC OUTCOMES; ASSESS IMPROVEMENT; TRIALS; CARE; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION-38; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1002/pst.531
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Subgroup analysis is an integral part of access and reimbursement dossiers, in particular health technology assessment (HTA), and their HTA recommendations are often limited to subpopulations. HTA recommendations for subpopulations are not always clear and without controversies. In this paper, we review several HTA guidelines regarding subgroup analyses. We describe good statistical principles for subgroup analyses of clinical effectiveness to support HTAs and include case examples where HTA recommendations were given to subpopulations only. Unlike regulatory submissions, pharmaceutical statisticians in most companies have had limited involvement in the planning, design and preparation of HTA/payers submissions. We hope to change this by highlighting how pharmaceutical statisticians should contribute to payers' submissions. This includes early engagement in reimbursement strategy discussions to influence the design, analysis and interpretation of phase III randomized clinical trials as well as meta-analyses/network meta-analyses. The focus on this paper is on subgroup analyses relating to clinical effectiveness as we believe this is the first key step of statistical involvement and influence in the preparation of HTA and reimbursement submissions. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 538
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GUID METH TECHN APPR
[2]  
[Anonymous], NICE TECHN APPR GUID
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, NICE STA MAN SUBM PR
[4]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL VALUE JUDGMEN
[5]  
[Anonymous], EUNETHTA JOINT ACT
[6]  
[Anonymous], METH GUID EFF COMP E
[7]  
[Anonymous], METH REF GUID EFF CO
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2003, NICE TECHN APPR 65 R
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2009, REP TECHN WORKSH HEL
[10]   Value of information on preference heterogeneity and individualized care [J].
Basu, Anirban ;
Meltzer, David .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2007, 27 (02) :112-127