Safe Laparoscopic Removal of a 3200 Gram Fibroid Uterus

被引:6
作者
Demir, Richard H. [1 ]
Marchand, Gregory J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona Reg Med Ctr, Mesa, AZ USA
关键词
Laparoscopic hysterectomy; Fibroid uterus; ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; UNITED-STATES; TRIAL; RATES;
D O I
10.4293/108680810X12924466008169
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: Hysterectomy using minimally invasive techniques yields fewer complications, less blood loss, and quicker recovery time compared with traditional abdominal hysterectomy. Despite these advantages, > 65% of all hysterectomies in the United States are still performed using traditional laparotomy, and many clinicians still exclude patients with a history of prior abdominal surgery, significant obesity, or a large fibroid uterus from these procedures. Among physicians skilled in minimally invasive surgery, the prior largest uteri removed included a 2421g uterus removed vaginally, and a 2418g uterus removed via hand-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. Methods: We performed a laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy on a significantly obese 50-year-old woman with a 3200g uterus. The patient required a 2-day hospital stay and recovered unremarkably. The patient was able to return to work within one week and quickly returned to activities of daily life. Conclusion: In the hands of experienced minimally invasive surgeons, laparotomy can be avoided in almost all instances of hysterectomy for benign disease.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 602
页数:3
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
*2 KIL CLUB, MEMB
[2]  
[Anonymous], OBSTET GYNECOL
[3]   Transvaginal hysterectomy or laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy for nonprolapsed uteri [J].
Chang, WC ;
Huang, SC ;
Sheu, BC ;
Chen, CL ;
Torng, PL ;
Hsu, WC ;
Chang, DY .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 106 (02) :321-326
[4]   Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy [J].
Falcone, T ;
Paraiso, MFR ;
Mascha, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 180 (04) :955-962
[5]   Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997 [J].
Farquhar, CM ;
Steiner, CA .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (02) :229-234
[6]   The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy [J].
Garry, R ;
Fountain, J ;
Mason, S ;
Napp, V ;
Brown, J ;
Hawe, J ;
Clayton, R ;
Abbott, J ;
Phillips, G ;
Whittaker, M ;
Lilford, R ;
Bridgman, S .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7432) :129-133
[7]   Safety aspects of laparoscopic hysterectomy [J].
Härkki, P ;
Kurki, T ;
Sjoberg, J ;
Tiitinen, A .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 80 (05) :383-391
[8]   Nationwide Use of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Compared With Abdominal and Vaginal Approaches [J].
Jacoby, Vanessa L. ;
Autry, Amy ;
Jacobson, Gavin ;
Domush, Robert ;
Nakagawa, Sanae ;
Jacoby, Alison .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 114 (05) :1041-1048
[9]   A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy [J].
Olsson, JH ;
Ellstrom, M ;
Hahlin, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (04) :345-350
[10]   Should uterine size alone require laparoscopic assistance? Vaginal hysterectomy for a 2003-g uterus [J].
Pelosi, MA ;
Pelosi, MA .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A, 1998, 8 (02) :99-103