Norovirus in shellfish: An overview of post-harvest treatments and their challenges

被引:23
作者
Gyawali, Pradip [1 ]
Fletcher, Graham C. [2 ]
McCoubrey, Dorothy-Jean [3 ]
Hewitt, Joanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Environm Sci & Res Ltd ESR, Porirua, New Zealand
[2] New Zealand Inst Plant & Food Res Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Dorothy Jean & Associates Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Norovirus; Shellfish safety; Public health risk; Inactivation strategy; High pressure processing; Post-harvest; HEPATITIS-A VIRUS; HIGH-PRESSURE-INACTIVATION; HIGH HYDROSTATIC-PRESSURE; CONTAMINATED OYSTERS; MURINE NOROVIRUS-1; ENTERIC VIRUSES; NEW-ZEALAND; FELINE CALICIVIRUS; TRANSMISSION; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.12.049
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Filter feeding bivalve molluscan shellfish such as oysters, mussels and clams can readily accumulate norovirus present in growing water contaminated by human faecal material from point and non-point sources. While pre-harvest preventative interventions are preferable, post-harvest interventions such as depuration, relaying and thermal treatment have been used to mitigate the risk of norovirus infection associated with shellfish consumption. However, even with available pre- and post-harvest interventions, norovirus outbreaks associated with shellfish consumption are still reported worldwide. Analyses of faecal indicator bacteria, i.e. total coliforms, Escherichia coli or Enterococci spp. are commonly used to classify shellfish growing waters. Such classifications are used as a pre-harvest intervention, to identify when harvesting should be restricted and/or determine the necessity of post-harvest treatments. Post-harvest depuration treatment does not necessarily remove norovirus from shellfish tissue, and freezing has little or no effect on norovirus infectivity in shellfish. Thermal treatments can inactivate norovirus but they also change the organoleptic characteristics of shellfish which makes them unacceptable to some consumers. High pressure processing is an alternative post-harvest intervention that has potential to inactivate norovirus effectively with a reduction of 2.8-4.0 logio genome copies at 300-450 MPa. However, a human challenge showed that less than 600 MPa are not sufficient to prevent norovirus infection when people consume artificially-contaminated shellfish. This study critically evaluates the applicability of, and the challenges associated with, these interventions to improve shellfish safety.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 179
页数:9
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Norovirus outbreak associated with undercooked oysters and secondary household transmission [J].
Alfano-Sobsey, E. ;
Sweat, D. ;
Hall, A. ;
Breedlove, F. ;
Rodriguez, R. ;
Greene, S. ;
Pierce, A. ;
Sobsey, M. ;
Davies, M. ;
Ledford, S. L. .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2012, 140 (02) :276-282
[2]  
[Anonymous], AN PROD NOT SPEC PRO
[3]  
[Anonymous], ANN TECHN REP CAL YE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, AN PROD SPEC BIV MOL
[5]  
[Anonymous], HIGH PRESSURE PROCES
[6]   High-Pressure Inactivation of Rotaviruses: Role of Treatment Temperature and Strain Diversity in Virus Inactivation [J].
Araud, Elbashir ;
DiCaprio, Erin ;
Yang, Zhihong ;
Li, Xinhui ;
Lou, Fangfei ;
Hughes, John H. ;
Chen, Haiqiang ;
Li, Jianrong .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 81 (19) :6669-6678
[7]   Effect of high hydrostatic pressure on murine norovirus in Manila clams [J].
Arcangeli, G. ;
Terregino, C. ;
De Benedictis, P. ;
Zecchin, B. ;
Manfrin, A. ;
Rossetti, E. ;
Magnabosco, C. ;
Mancin, M. ;
Brutti, A. .
LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 54 (04) :325-329
[8]   Shellfish-Borne Viral Outbreaks: A Systematic Review [J].
Bellou, M. ;
Kokkinos, P. ;
Vantarakis, A. .
FOOD AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIROLOGY, 2013, 5 (01) :13-23
[9]   A survey of Australian oysters for the presence of human noroviruses [J].
Brake, Felicity ;
Ross, Tom ;
Holds, Geoffrey ;
Kiermeier, Andreas ;
McLeod, Catherine .
FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 44 :264-270
[10]   High-pressure inactivation of hepatitis A virus within oysters [J].
Calci, KR ;
Meade, GK ;
Tezloff, RC ;
Kingsley, DH .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 71 (01) :339-343