A global network topology of stock markets: Transmitters and receivers of spillover effects

被引:55
作者
Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain [1 ,2 ]
Hernandez, Jose Areola [3 ]
Rehman, Mobeen Ur [4 ]
Al-Yahyaee, Khamis Hamed [5 ]
Zakaria, Muhammad [6 ]
机构
[1] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Dept Management Sci & Technol Dev, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[2] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Fac Finance & Banking, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] ESC Rennes Sch Business, Rennes, Brittany, France
[4] SZABIST, Islamabad, Pakistan
[5] Sultan Qaboos Univ, Coll Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Econ & Finance, Muscat, Oman
[6] COMSATS Inst Informat Technol, Dept Management Sci, Islamabad, Pakistan
关键词
Global equity markets; Return connectedness; Global network structure; Cross-quantilogram model; Economic spillovers; INTERNATIONAL EQUITY MARKETS; US FINANCIAL CRISIS; DIRECTIONAL PREDICTABILITY; VOLATILITY SPILLOVERS; CONTAGION; LINKAGES; TRANSMISSION; INDEXES; INTERDEPENDENCE; QUANTILOGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2017.11.132
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
This paper applies a bivariate cross-quantilogram approach to examine the spillover network structure in the stock markets of 58 countries according to bearish, normal and bullish market scenarios. Our aim is to identify the strongest interdependencies, the directionality of the spillover risk effects, and to detect those equity markets with the potential to cause global systemic risk. The results highlight the role of the US and Canadian equity markets as major spillover transmitters, while the stock markets of Romania, Taiwan and Mexico act mainly as spillover receivers. Particularly strong spillovers are observed from the Canadian and US equity markets towards the Irish market, and from the Brazilian equity market towards the Kenyan equivalent. The equity market networks suggest that only the US equity market can trigger systemic risk on a global scale. Implications of the results are discussed. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2136 / 2153
页数:18
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Hedging emerging market stock prices with oil, gold, VIX, and bonds: A comparison between DCC, ADCC and GO-GARCH [J].
Abul Basher, Syed ;
Sadorsky, Perry .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 54 :235-247
[2]   Implied volatility term structure linkages between VDAX, VSMI and VSTOXX volatility indices [J].
Aijo, Janne .
GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2008, 18 (03) :290-302
[3]   Global financial crisis, extreme interdependences, and contagion effects: The role of economic structure? [J].
Aloui, Riadh ;
Ben Aiessa, Mohamed Safouane ;
Nguyen, Duc Khuong .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2011, 35 (01) :130-141
[4]  
[Anonymous], CONSTRUCTION I EC GR
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Journal of Empirical Finance, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JEMPFIN.2003.08.001
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, ECON J, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0297.2008.02208.X
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2001, INT FINANCIAL CONTAG
[8]   A new approach to measuring financial contagion [J].
Bae, KH ;
Karolyi, GA ;
Stulz, RM .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2003, 16 (03) :717-763
[9]   Volatility spillover effects in European equity markets [J].
Baele, L .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2005, 40 (02) :373-401
[10]   Global, local, and contagious investor sentiment [J].
Baker, Malcolm ;
Wurgler, Jeffrey ;
Yuan, Yu .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 104 (02) :272-287