Effective improvement of multi-step-ahead flood forecasting accuracy through encoder-decoder with an exogenous input structure

被引:61
作者
Cui, Zhen [1 ]
Zhou, Yanlai [1 ]
Guo, Shenglian [1 ]
Wang, Jun [1 ]
Xu, Chong-Yu [2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn S, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Oslo, Dept Geosci, POB 1047 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Flood forecasting; Multi-step-ahead; Neural network; Deep learning; Encoder-Decoder; Exogenous input; WATER-QUALITY; RAINFALL; MACHINE; RUNOFF; PRECIPITATION; NETWORK; RIVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127764
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Accurate and reliable multi-step-ahead flood forecasting is beneficial for reservoir operation and water resources management. The Encoder-Decoder (ED) that can tackle sequence-to-sequence problems is suitable for multistep-ahead flood forecasting. This study proposes a novel ED with an exogenous input (EDE) structure for multi-step-ahead flood forecasting. The exogenous input can be the outputs of process-based hydrological models. This study constructs four multi-step-ahead flood forecasting approaches, including the Xinanjiang (XAJ) hydrological model, the single-output long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network with recursive strategies, the recursive ED combined with the LSTM neural network (LSTM-RED), and the LSTM-EDE models. The performance of these four models is evaluated and compared by the long-term 3 h hydrologic data series of the Lushui and Jianxi basins in China. The results show that the LSTM-RED model that integrates recursive strategies into the training process of neural networks is more advantageous than the LSTM model. The proposed LSTMEDE model can overcome the exposure bias problem, simplify its model structure, increase the computational efficiency in the validation process, and improve the multi-step-ahead flood forecasting accuracy, as compared to the LSTM-RED model.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, DOI DOI 10.5194/HESS-22-6005-2018
[2]  
Bengio S, 2015, ADV NEUR IN, V28
[3]   Daily vs. hourly simulation for estimating future flood peaks in mesoscale catchments [J].
Beylich, Marcus ;
Haberlandt, Uwe ;
Reinstorf, Frido .
HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 52 (04) :821-833
[4]   Advancing tracer-aided rainfall-runoff modelling: a review of progress, problems and unrealised potential [J].
Birkel, Christian ;
Soulsby, Chris .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2015, 29 (25) :5227-5240
[5]   Impact of ENSO regimes on developing- and decaying-phase precipitation during rainy season in China [J].
Cao, Qing ;
Hao, Zhenchun ;
Yuan, Feifei ;
Su, Zhenkuan ;
Berndtsson, Ronny ;
Hao, Jie ;
Nyima, Tsring .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2017, 21 (11) :5415-5426
[6]   A nonlinear spatio-temporal lumping of radar rainfall for modeling multi-step-ahead inflow forecasts by data-driven techniques [J].
Chang, Fi-John ;
Tsai, Meng-Jung .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 535 :256-269
[7]   Modeling water quality in an urban river using hydrological factors - Data driven approaches [J].
Chang, Fi-John ;
Tsai, Yu-Hsuan ;
Chen, Pin-An ;
Coynel, Alexandra ;
Vachaud, Georges .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 151 :87-96
[8]   Watershed rainfall forecasting using neuro-fuzzy networks with the assimilation of multi-sensor information [J].
Chang, Fi-John ;
Chiang, Yen-Ming ;
Tsai, Meng-Jung ;
Shieh, Ming-Chang ;
Hsu, Kuo-Lin ;
Sorooshian, Soroosh .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2014, 508 :374-384
[9]   The importance of short lag-time in the runoff forecasting model based on long short-term memory [J].
Chen, Xi ;
Huang, Jiaxu ;
Han, Zhen ;
Gao, Hongkai ;
Liu, Min ;
Li, Zhiqiang ;
Liu, Xiaoping ;
Li, Qingli ;
Qi, Honggang ;
Huang, Yonggui .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 589
[10]  
Cho K., 2014, PROC 8 WORKSHOP SYNT, P103, DOI DOI 10.3115/V1/W14-4012