Derivation and validation of a novel Emergency Surgery Acuity Score (ESAS)

被引:79
作者
Sangji, Naveen F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bohnen, Jordan D. [1 ]
Ramly, Elie P. [1 ]
Yeh, Daniel D. [1 ]
King, David R. [1 ]
DeMoya, Marc [1 ]
Butler, Kathryn [1 ]
Fagenholz, Peter J. [1 ]
Velmahos, George C. [1 ]
Chang, David C. [2 ,3 ]
Kaafarani, Haytham M. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Trauma Emergency Surg & Surg Crit Care, 165 Cambridge St,Suite 810, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Codman Ctr Clin Effectiveness Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
Emergency surgery; mortality score; quality benchmarking; perioperative mortality; outcomes; GENERAL-SURGERY; DISEASE; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; PREDICTORS; SEVERITY; BURDEN; SYSTEM; SCALE; TOOL;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0000000000001059
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: There currently exists no preoperative risk stratification system for emergency surgery (ES). We sought to develop an Emergency Surgery Acuity Score (ESAS) that helps predict perioperative mortality in ES patients. METHODS: Using the 2011 American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (derivation cohort), we identified all surgical procedures that were classified as "emergent." A three-step methodology was then performed. First, multiple logistic regression models were created to identify independent predictors (e.g., patient demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative laboratory variables) of 30-day mortality in ES. Second, based on the relative impact of each identified predictor (i.e., odds ratio), using weighted averages, a novel score was derived. Third, using the 2012 ACS-NSQIP database (validation cohort), the score was validated by calculating its C statistic and evaluating its ability to predict 30-day mortality. RESULTS: From 280,801 NSQIP cases, 18,439 ES cases were analyzed, of which 1,598 (8.7%) resulted in death at 30 days. The multiple logistic regression analyses identified 22 independent predictors of mortality. Based on the relative impact of these predictors, ESAS was derived with a total score range of 0 to 29. ESAS had a C statistic of 0.86; the probability of death at 30 days gradually increased from 0% to 36% then 100% at scores of 0, 11, and 22, respectively. In the validation phase, 19,552 patients were included, the mortality rate was 7.2%, and the ESAS C statistic stayed at 0.86. CONCLUSION: We have therefore developed and validated a novel score, ESAS, that accurately predicts mortality in ES patients. Such a score could prove useful for (1) preoperative patient counseling, (2) identification of patients needing close postoperative monitoring, and (3) risk adjustment in any efforts at benchmarking the quality of ES. Copyright (C) 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 220
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ACS NSQIP, 2015, AB ACS NSQIP
[2]  
ACS NSQIP, 2012, US GUID 2012 ACS NSQ
[3]  
ACS NSQIP, DAT COLL AN REP
[4]  
ACS NSQIP, 2011, US GUID 2011 PART US
[5]   A PRACTICAL SCORE FOR THE EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS [J].
ALVARADO, A .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1986, 15 (05) :557-564
[6]  
American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST), AC CAR SURG INTR
[7]   Patient-centered informed consent in surgical practice [J].
Bernat, JL ;
Peterson, LM .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2006, 141 (01) :86-92
[8]   Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: Morbidity and Mortality Risk Calculator for Colorectal Surgery [J].
Cohen, Mark E. ;
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. ;
Hall, Bruce Lee .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 208 (06) :1009-1016
[9]  
COPELAND GP, 1991, BRIT J SURG, V78, P356
[10]   Application of a uniform anatomic grading system to measure disease severity in eight emergency general surgical illnesses [J].
Crandall, Marie L. ;
Agarwal, Suresh ;
Muskat, Peter ;
Ross, Steven ;
Savage, Stephanie ;
Schuster, Kevin ;
Tominaga, Gail T. ;
Shafi, Shahid .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2014, 77 (05) :705-708