Optoacoustic Breast Imaging: Imaging-Pathology Correlation of Optoacoustic Features in Benign and Malignant Breast Masses

被引:20
作者
Butler, Reni [1 ]
Lavin, Philip T. [2 ]
Tucker, F. Lee [3 ]
Barke, Lora D. [4 ]
Bohm-Velez, Marcela [5 ]
Destounis, Stamatia [6 ]
Grobmyer, Stephen R. [7 ]
Katzen, Janine [8 ]
Kist, Kenneth A. [9 ]
Makariou, Erini V. [10 ]
Schilling, Kathy J. [11 ]
Young, Catherine A. [12 ,13 ]
Dogan, Basak E. [14 ,15 ]
Neuschler, Erin I. [16 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, Smilow Canc Hosp, POB 208042, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Boston Biostat Res Fdn, Framingham, MA USA
[3] Virginia Biomed Labs LLC, Wirtz, VA USA
[4] Radiol Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO USA
[5] Weinstein Imaging Associates, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Elizabeth Wende Breast Care, Rochester, NY USA
[7] Cleveland Clin, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[8] Weill Cornell Med, New York, NY USA
[9] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[10] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Washington, DC USA
[11] Boca Raton Reg Hosp, Boca Raton, FL USA
[12] Austin Radiol Assoc, Austin, TX USA
[13] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, St Louis, MO USA
[14] MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Houston, TX USA
[15] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiol, Dallas, TX USA
[16] Northwestern Univ, Dept Radiol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
breast cancer; breast ultrasound; imaging-pathology correlation; optoacoustic imaging; photoacoustic imaging; DIFFUSE OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS; INTERPRETIVE PERFORMANCE; SPATIAL-RESOLUTION; TUMOR ANGIOGENESIS; DENSE BREASTS; BLOOD-FLOW; IN-VIVO; CANCER;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.17.18435
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. Optoacoustic ultrasound breast imaging is a fused anatomic and functional modality that shows morphologic features, as well as hemoglobin amount and relative oxygenation within and around breast masses. The purpose of this study is to investigate the positive predictive value (PPV) of optoacoustic ultrasound features in benign and malignant masses. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In this study, 92 masses assessed as BI-RADS category 3, 4, or 5 in 94 subjects were imaged with optoacoustic ultrasound. Each mass was scored by seven blinded independent readers according to three internal features in the tumor interior and two external features in its boundary zone and periphery. Mean and median optoacoustic ultrasound scores were compared with histologic findings for biopsied masses and nonbiopsied BI-RADS category 3 masses, which were considered benign if they were stable at 12-month follow-up. Statistical significance was analyzed using a two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test with a 0.05 significance level. RESULTS. Mean and median optoacoustic ultrasound scores for all individual internal and external features, as well as summed scores, were higher for malignant masses than for benign masses (p < 0.0001). High external scores, indicating increased hemoglobin and deoxygenation and abnormal vessel morphologic features in the tumor boundary zone and periphery, better distinguished benign from malignant masses than did high internal scores reflecting increased hemoglobin and deoxygenation within the tumor interior. CONCLUSION. High optoacoustic ultrasound scores, particularly those based on external features in the boundary zone and periphery of breast masses, have high PPVs for malignancy and, conversely, low optoacoustic ultrasound scores have low PPV for malignancy. The functional component of optoacoustic ultrasound may help to overcome some of the limitations of morphologic overlap in the distinction of benign and malignant masses.
引用
收藏
页码:1155 / 1170
页数:16
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Ultimate spatial resolution with Diffuse Optical Tomography
    Azizi, Leila
    Zarychta, Katarzyna
    Ettori, Dominique
    Tinet, Eric
    Tualle, Jean-Michel
    [J]. OPTICS EXPRESS, 2009, 17 (14): : 12132 - 12144
  • [2] The Role of MR Mammography in Differentiating Benign from Malignant in Suspicious Breast Masses
    Balasubramanian, Padhmini
    Murugesan, Vijaya Karthikeyan
    Boopathy, Vinoth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (09) : TC5 - TC8
  • [3] Bell A.G., 1880, AM J SCI, V20, P305, DOI DOI 10.2475/AJS.S3-20.118.305
  • [4] Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer
    Berg, Wendie A.
    Blume, Jeffrey D.
    Cormack, Jean B.
    Mendelson, Ellen B.
    Lehrer, Daniel
    Bohm-Velez, Marcela
    Pisano, Etta D.
    Jong, Roberta A.
    Evans, W. Phil
    Morton, Marilyn J.
    Mahoney, Mary C.
    Larsen, Linda Hovanessian
    Barr, Richard G.
    Farria, Dione M.
    Marques, Helga S.
    Boparai, Karan
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 299 (18): : 2151 - 2163
  • [5] Training the ACRIN 6666 Investigators and Effects of Feedback on Breast Ultrasound Interpretive Performance and Agreement in BI-RADS Ultrasound Feature Analysis
    Berg, Wendie A.
    Blume, Jeffrey D.
    Cormack, Jean B.
    Mendelson, Ellen B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 199 (01) : 224 - 235
  • [6] Discussing the benefits and harms of screening mammography
    Brennan, Meagan
    Houssami, Nehmat
    [J]. MATURITAS, 2016, 92 : 150 - 153
  • [7] Diagnostic Mammography: Identifying Minimally Acceptable Interpretive Performance Criteria
    Carney, Patricia A.
    Parikh, Jay
    Sickles, Edward A.
    Feig, Stephen A.
    Monsees, Barbara
    Bassett, Lawrence W.
    Smith, Robert A.
    Rosenberg, Robert
    Ichikawa, Laura
    Wallace, James
    Khai Tran
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2013, 267 (02) : 359 - 367
  • [8] US-GUIDED OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY: CORRELATION WITH CLINICOPATHOLOGIC VARIABLES IN BREAST CANCER
    Choi, Ji Soo
    Kim, Min Jung
    Youk, Ji Hyun
    Moon, Hee Jung
    Suh, Hee Jung
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 39 (02) : 233 - 240
  • [9] Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study
    Ciatto, Stefano
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Bernardi, Daniela
    Caumo, Francesca
    Pellegrini, Marco
    Brunelli, Silvia
    Tuttobene, Paola
    Bricolo, Paola
    Fanto, Carmine
    Valentini, Marvi
    Montemezzi, Stefania
    Macaskill, Petra
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (07) : 583 - 589
  • [10] Cicchetti D. V., 1994, Psychol Assessment, V6, P284, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284, 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284]