Use of Mendelian Randomization for Identifying Risk Factors for Brain Tumors

被引:19
作者
Howell, Amy Elizabeth [1 ]
Zheng, Jie [2 ]
Haycock, Philip C. [2 ]
McAleenan, Alexandra [3 ]
Relton, Caroline [2 ]
Martin, Richard M. [2 ]
Kurian, Kathreena M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Inst Clin Neurosci, Brain Tumour Res Ctr, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, MRC Integrat Epidemiol Unit, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
来源
FRONTIERS IN GENETICS | 2018年 / 9卷
关键词
Mendelian randomization; glioma; risk factors; genetic variant; causal inference; SNP; causal association; CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM; NIH-AARP DIET; NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS; PLEIOTROPIC GENETIC-VARIANTS; ADULT GLIOMA; GLIOBLASTOMA-MULTIFORME; ALCOHOL-CONSUMPTION; TELOMERE LENGTH; INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES; OCCUPATIONAL-EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.3389/fgene.2018.00525
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Gliomas are a group of primary brain tumors, the most common and aggressive subtype of which is glioblastoma. Glioblastoma has a median survival of just 15 months after diagnosis. Only previous exposure to ionizing radiation and particular inherited genetic syndromes are accepted risk factors for glioma; the vast majority of cases are thought to occur spontaneously. Previous observational studies have described associations between several risk factors and glioma, but studies are often conflicting and whether these associations reflect true casual relationships is unclear because observational studies may be susceptible to confounding, measurement error and reverse causation. Mendelian randomization (MR) is a form of instrumental variable analysis that can be used to provide supporting evidence for causal relationships between exposures (e.g., risk factors) and outcomes (e.g., disease onset). MR utilizes genetic variants, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), that are robustly associated with an exposure to determine whether there is a causal effect of the exposure on the outcome. MR is less susceptible to confounding, reverse causation and measurement errors as it is based on the random inheritance during conception of genetic variants that can be relatively accurately measured. In previous studies, MR has implicated a genetically predicted increase in telomere length with an increased risk of glioma, and found little evidence that obesity related factors, vitamin D or atopy are causal in glioma risk. In this review, we describe MR and its potential use to discover and validate novel risk factors, mechanistic factors, and therapeutic targets in glioma.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 170 条
  • [1] Approaching a Scientific Consensus on the Association between Allergies and Glioma Risk: A Report from the Glioma International Case-Control Study
    Amirian, E. Susan
    Zhou, Renke
    Wrensch, Margaret R.
    Olson, Sara H.
    Scheurer, Michael E.
    Il'yasova, Dora
    Lachance, Daniel
    Armstrong, Georgina N.
    McCoy, Lucie S.
    Lau, Ching C.
    Claus, Elizabeth B.
    Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill S.
    Schildkraut, Joellen
    Ali-Osman, Francis
    Sadetzki, Siegal
    Johansen, Christoffer
    Houlston, Richard S.
    Jenkins, Robert B.
    Bernstein, Jonine L.
    Merrell, Ryan T.
    Davis, Faith G.
    Lai, Rose
    Shete, Sanjay
    Amos, Christopher I.
    Melin, Beatrice S.
    Bondy, Melissa L.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2016, 25 (02) : 282 - 290
  • [2] Hormonal contraceptive use and risk of glioma among younger women: a nationwide case-control study
    Andersen, Lene
    Friis, Soren
    Hallas, Jesper
    Ravn, Pernille
    Kristensen, Bjarne W.
    Gaist, David
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 79 (04) : 677 - 684
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, ELIFE, DOI 10.1101/078972
  • [4] Risk of nervous system cancer among workers exposed to lead
    Anttila, A
    Heikkila, P
    Nykyri, E
    Kauppinen, T
    Pukkala, E
    Hernberg, S
    Hemminki, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1996, 38 (02) : 131 - 136
  • [5] Phase II and Phase III attrition rates 2011-2012
    Arrowsmith, John
    Miller, Philip
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2013, 12 (08) : 568 - 568
  • [6] Drug repositioning: Identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs
    Ashburn, TT
    Thor, KB
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2004, 3 (08) : 673 - 683
  • [7] Therapeutic strategies to improve drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier
    Azad, Tej D.
    Pan, James
    Connolly, Ian D.
    Remington, Austin
    Wilson, Christy M.
    Grant, Gerald A.
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2015, 38 (03)
  • [8] Epigenome-Wide Scans Identify Differentially Methylated Regions for Age and Age-Related Phenotypes in a Healthy Ageing Population
    Bell, Jordana T.
    Tsai, Pei-Chien
    Yang, Tsun-Po
    Pidsley, Ruth
    Nisbet, James
    Glass, Daniel
    Mangino, Massimo
    Zhai, Guangju
    Zhang, Feng
    Valdes, Ana
    Shin, So-Youn
    Dempster, Emma L.
    Murray, Robin M.
    Grundberg, Elin
    Hedman, Asa K.
    Nica, Alexandra
    Small, Kerrin S.
    Dermitzakis, Emmanouil T.
    McCarthy, Mark I.
    Mill, Jonathan
    Spector, Tim D.
    Deloukas, Panos
    [J]. PLOS GENETICS, 2012, 8 (04): : 189 - 200
  • [9] Is beer consumption related to measures of abdominal and general obesity? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bendsen, Nathalie T.
    Christensen, Robin
    Bartels, Else M.
    Kok, Frans J.
    Sierksma, Aafje
    Raben, Anne
    Astrup, Arne
    [J]. NUTRITION REVIEWS, 2013, 71 (02) : 67 - 87
  • [10] Mendelian randomisation in cardiovascular research: an introduction for clinicians
    Bennett, Derrick A.
    Holmes, Michael V.
    [J]. HEART, 2017, 103 (18) : 1400 - 1407