Intermittent theta burst stimulation over the parietal cortex has a significant neural effect on working memory

被引:4
作者
Deng, Xinping [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jue [3 ]
Zang, Yufeng [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Li, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Fu, Wenjin [1 ,2 ]
Su, Yanyan [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Xiongying [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Du, Boqi [1 ,2 ]
Dong, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Chuansheng [10 ]
Li, Jun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Cognit Neurosci & Learning, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, IDG McGovern Inst Brain Res, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chengdu Sport Univ, Inst Sports Med & Hlth, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Hangzhou Normal Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Ctr Cognit & Brain Disorders, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Hangzhou Normal Univ, Inst Psychol Sci, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Zhejiang Key Lab Res Assessment Cognit Impairment, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[7] Capital Med Univ, Sch Mental Hlth, Beijing Anding Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Mental Disorders, Beijing, Peoples R China
[8] Capital Med Univ, Sch Mental Hlth, Beijing Anding Hosp, Beijing Key Lab Mental Disorders, Beijing, Peoples R China
[9] Capital Med Univ, Sch Mental Hlth, Beijing Anding Hosp, Adv Innovat Ctr Human Brain Protect, Beijing, Peoples R China
[10] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Psychol Sci, Irvine, CA USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
contralateral delay activity; parietal cortex; theta burst stimulation; working memory; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; POSTERIOR PARIETAL; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; CAUSAL EVIDENCE; CAPACITY; MECHANISMS; MAINTENANCE;
D O I
10.1002/hbm.25708
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The crucial role of the parietal cortex in working memory (WM) storage has been identified by fMRI studies. However, it remains unknown whether repeated parietal intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) can improve WM. In this within-subject randomized controlled study, under the guidance of fMRI-identified parietal activation in the left hemisphere, 22 healthy adults received real and sham iTBS sessions (five consecutive days, 600 pulses per day for each session) with an interval of 9 months between the two sessions. Electroencephalography signals of each subject before and after both iTBS sessions were collected during a change detection task. Changes in contralateral delay activity (CDA) and K-score were then calculated to reflect neural and behavioral WM improvement. Repeated-measures ANOVA suggested that real iTBS increased CDA more than the sham one (p = .011 for iTBS effect). Further analysis showed that this effect was more significant in the left hemisphere than in the right hemisphere (p = .029 for the hemisphere-by-iTBS interaction effect). Pearson correlation analyses showed significant correlations for two conditions between CDA changes in the left hemisphere and K score changes (ps <.05). In terms of the behavioral results, significant K score changes after real iTBS were observed for two conditions, but a repeated-measures ANOVA showed a nonsignificant main effect of iTBS (p = .826). These results indicate that the current iTBS protocol is a promising way to improve WM capability based on the neural indicator (CDA) but further optimization is needed to produce a behavioral effect.
引用
收藏
页码:1076 / 1086
页数:11
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Selective Entrainment of Theta Oscillations in the Dorsal Stream Causally Enhances Auditory Working Memory Performance
    Albouy, Philippe
    Weiss, Aurelien
    Baillet, Sylvain
    Zatorre, Robert J.
    [J]. NEURON, 2017, 94 (01) : 193 - +
  • [2] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhances working memory
    Bagherzadeh, Yasaman
    Khorrami, Anahita
    Zarrindast, Mohammad Reza
    Shariat, Seyed Vahid
    Pantazis, Dimitrios
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2016, 234 (07) : 1807 - 1818
  • [3] Neural sources of visual working memory maintenance in human parietal and ventral extrastriate visual cortex
    Becke, Andreas
    Mueller, Notger
    Vellage, Anne
    Schoenfeld, Mircea Ariel
    Hopf, Jens-Max
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2015, 110 : 78 - 86
  • [4] Neural mechanisms of interference control in working memory capacity
    Bomyea, Jessica
    Taylor, Charles T.
    Spadoni, Andrea D.
    Simmons, Alan N.
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2018, 39 (02) : 772 - 782
  • [5] On the Role of the Inferior Intraparietal Sulcus in Visual Working Memory for Lateralized Single-feature Objects
    Brigadoi, Sabrina
    Cutini, Simone
    Meconi, Federica
    Castellaro, Marco
    Sessa, Paola
    Marangon, Mattia
    Bertoldo, Alessandra
    Jolicour, Pierre
    Dell'Acqua, Roberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 29 (02) : 337 - 351
  • [6] Working memory improvement with non-invasive brain stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Brunoni, Andre Russowsky
    Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne
    [J]. BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2014, 86 : 1 - 9
  • [7] The effect of single and repeated prefrontal intermittent theta burst stimulation on cortical reactivity and working memory
    Chung, Sung Wook
    Rogasch, Nigel C.
    Hoy, Kate E.
    Fitzgerald, Paul B.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (03) : 566 - 574
  • [8] Demonstration of short-term plasticity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with theta burst stimulation: A TMS-EEG study
    Chung, Sung Wook
    Lewis, Benjamin P.
    Rogasch, Nigel C.
    Saeki, Takashi
    Thomson, Richard H.
    Hoy, Kate E.
    Bailey, Neil W.
    Fitzgerald, Paul B.
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 128 (07) : 1117 - 1126
  • [9] The neuroscience of working memory capacity and training
    Constantinidis, Christos
    Klingberg, Torkel
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 17 (07) : 438 - 449
  • [10] Lateralization of Brain Networks and Clinical Severity in Toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A HARDI Diffusion MRI Study
    Conti, Eugenia
    Calderoni, Sara
    Gaglianese, Anna
    Pannek, Kerstin
    Mazzotti, Sara
    Rose, Stephen
    Scelfo, Danilo
    Tosetti, Michela
    Muratori, Filippo
    Cioni, Giovanni
    Guzzetta, Andrea
    [J]. AUTISM RESEARCH, 2016, 9 (03) : 382 - 392