Communicating the Risk of Violent and Offending Behavior: Review and Introduction to this Special Issue

被引:35
作者
Hilton, N. Zoe [1 ,2 ]
Scurich, Nicholas [3 ,4 ]
Helmus, Leslie-Maaike [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychiat, Penetanguishene, ON, Canada
[2] Waypoint Res Inst, Penetanguishene, ON L9M 1G3, Canada
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Law, Dept Psychol & Social Behav, Irvine, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Law, Dept Criminol Law & Soc, Irvine, CA USA
[5] Forens Assessment Grp, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; DECISION-MAKING; NUMERACY; PROBABILITY; INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; FREQUENCY; ACCURACY; FORMATS; ASSESSMENTS;
D O I
10.1002/bsl.2160
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
How to communicate risk of recidivism in correctional and forensic contexts has been a subject of scholarly discussion for two decades. This emerging literature, however, is sparse compared with studies on the assessment of risk for violent and offending behavior. In this special issue of Behavioral Sciences and the Law, we have gathered together empirical and review papers exemplifying promising directions and methodologies. We begin with a review of the state of the field, and lessons that can be drawn from research into medical risk assessment and risk communication, finding that many of the same principles apply to the forensic context. How risks are framed, and how numerate assessors are, affects how risk information is understood and applied. We discuss the existing research bearing on these issues, as well as the conceptual, practical, empirical, and legal implications of communicating risk using numerical or categorical risk terms. Along with the seven articles in this volume, we suggest directions for future research on measuring and communicating change, understanding and managing the statistical literacy of those who use and communicate risk assessments, and developing a theoretical framework for forensic risk communication research. We hope this volume will help integrate and invigorate research into forensic risk communication. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 131 条
[11]  
Babchishin K., 2009, CRIME SCENE, V16, P11
[12]  
Babchishin K. M., 2014, WHAT STAT SHOU UNPUB
[13]   GMO regulatory challenges and science: a European perspective [J].
Bartsch, Detlef .
JOURNAL FUR VERBRAUCHERSCHUTZ UND LEBENSMITTELSICHERHEIT-JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PROTECTION AND FOOD SAFETY, 2014, 9 :S51-S58
[14]   Within-treatment outcome among sexual offenders: A review [J].
Beggs, Sarah .
AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR, 2010, 15 (05) :369-379
[15]   Prosecution-Retained Versus Court-Appointed Experts: Comparing and Contrasting Risk Assessment Reports in Preventative Detention Hearings [J].
Blais, Julie ;
Forth, Adelle E. .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2014, 38 (06) :531-543
[16]   Are Actuarial Risk Data Used to Make Determinations of Sex Offender Risk Classification?: An Examination of Sex Offenders Selected for Enhanced Registration and Notification [J].
Blasko, Brandy L. ;
Jeglic, Elizabeth L. ;
Mercado, Cynthia Calkins .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2011, 55 (05) :676-692
[17]   Do Scores From Risk Measures Matter to Jurors? [J].
Boccaccini, Marcus T. ;
Turner, Darrel B. ;
Murrie, Daniel C. ;
Henderson, Craig E. ;
Chevalier, Caroline .
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2013, 19 (02) :259-269
[18]   Communicating Relative Risk Changes with Baseline Risk: Presentation Format and Numeracy Matter [J].
Bodemer, Nicolai ;
Meder, Bjoern ;
Gigerenzer, Gerd .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2014, 34 (05) :615-626
[19]   Improving the clinical practice of violence risk assessment - Technology, guidelines, and training [J].
Borum, R .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1996, 51 (09) :945-956
[20]  
Brust-Renck Priscila G, 2013, Rev Hum Factors Ergon, V8, P235