Long-Term Conditions in Older People are Linked with Loneliness, but a Sense of Coherence Buffers the Adverse Effects on Quality of Life: A Cross-Sectional Study

被引:1
|
作者
van Woerden, Hugo C. [1 ,2 ]
Angus, Neil [2 ]
Kiparoglou, Vasiliki [3 ]
Atherton, Iain [4 ]
Leung, Janni [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Highlands & Isl, Ctr Hlth Sci, Inverness IV2 3JH, Scotland
[2] Ulster Univ, Coleraine BT52 1SA, Londonderry, North Ireland
[3] Oxford Biomed Res Ctr, Natl Inst Hlth Res, Unipart House Business Ctr, Oxford OX4 2PG, England
[4] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] Univ Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia
关键词
loneliness; social loneliness; disability; rurality; quality of life; SOCIAL-ISOLATION; HEALTH; SCALE; RESILIENCE; DISABILITY; SYMPTOMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.2147/JMDH.S317393
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The impact of disability, long-term conditions, rurality, living alone, and being a carer on health has some evidence base, but the extent to which a strong sense of coherence (SoC), a factor hypothesised to promote wellbeing, may moderate these associations is unknown. A model of physical, environmental and social factors on quality of life was tested, with particular emphasis on whether a strong SoC buffered (mitigated) these determinants of quality of life. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional postal survey was undertaken of a random sample of 1471 respondents aged over 65 years, across a population of rural individuals. Physical, environmental, and psychological variables were assessed against quality of life using ANOVA and a generalised linear model including the interaction effects of SoC. Results: ANOVA demonstrated that age, gender, long-term conditions or disability (LTC-D), living alone, >20 hours unpaid care for others per week, SoC, and loneliness, were associated with lower quality of life (p<0.01). There were strong correlations (p>0.01), between age and LTC-D, living alone, and poor SoC. Living alone was correlated with emotional and social loneliness; but those with higher SoC were less likely to experience loneliness. In an adjusted generalised linear model, significant associations with a lower quality of life were observed from: LTC-D, emotional loneliness and social loneliness (B= -0.44, -0.30, and -0.39, respectively, all p<0.001). The only interaction with SoC that was statistically significant (at p<0.05) was LTC-D. A stronger sense of coherence buffered the negative effects of long-term condition/disability on quality of life. Discussion: The physical, environmental and social factors examined, identified LTC-D and loneliness to be the strongest factors associated with poor quality of life. Conclusion: SoC somewhat buffered the adverse effect of LTC-D on quality of life, but did not do so for loneliness.
引用
收藏
页码:2467 / 2475
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Care staff and family member perspectives on quality of life in people with very severe dementia in long-term care: a cross-sectional study
    Linda Clare
    Catherine Quinn
    Zoe Hoare
    Rhiannon Whitaker
    Robert T Woods
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12
  • [22] Care staff and family member perspectives on quality of life in people with very severe dementia in long-term care: a cross-sectional study
    Clare, Linda
    Quinn, Catherine
    Hoare, Zoe
    Whitaker, Rhiannon
    Woods, Robert T.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2014, 12
  • [23] Cross-sectional survey of long-term quality of life after radical perineal prostatectomy
    Yang, BK
    Crisci, A
    Young, MD
    Silverstein, AD
    Peterson, BL
    Dahm, P
    UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (01) : 120 - 125
  • [24] The effect of social frailty on mental health and quality of life in older people: a cross-sectional study
    Comertoglu, Ezgi Odaci
    Ozturk, Yelda
    Hafizoglu, Merve
    Kahyaoglu, Zeynep
    Cavusoglu, Cagatay
    Balci, Cafer
    Dogu, Burcu Balam
    Halil, Meltem
    Aki, Ozlem Erden
    Cankurtaran, Mustafa
    EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2024, 15 (02) : 453 - 461
  • [25] The effect of social frailty on mental health and quality of life in older people: a cross-sectional study
    Ezgi Odaci Comertoglu
    Yelda Ozturk
    Merve Hafizoglu
    Zeynep Kahyaoglu
    Cagatay Cavusoglu
    Cafer Balci
    Burcu Balam Dogu
    Meltem Halil
    Ozlem Erden Aki
    Mustafa Cankurtaran
    European Geriatric Medicine, 2024, 15 : 453 - 461
  • [26] Quality of Life in the Face of Depression Among Older People: A Cross-Sectional Study in Brazil and Portugal
    Vieira Cavalcante, Anna Carolyna
    de Souza Oliveira, Adriana Catarina
    Araujo de Oliveira Torres, Aline Gabriele
    dos Santos Felix, Elise Cristina
    da Silva Dantas, Bruno Araujo
    Arnoldo Nunes de Miranda, Francisco
    Gemito, Maria Laurencia
    Parreira Mendes, Felismina Rosa
    Torres, Gilson de Vasconcelos
    Chaves Maia, Eulalia Maria
    PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 33 (01) : 20 - 27
  • [27] A cross-sectional study on the health related quality of life of depressed Chinese older people in Shanghai
    Chan, Sally Wai-chi
    Shoumei, J. I. A.
    Thompson, David R.
    Yan, H. U.
    Chiu, Helen F. K.
    Chien, Wai-tong
    Lam, Linda
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 21 (09) : 883 - 889
  • [28] Impairment of kidney function and reduced quality-of-life in older people: a cross-sectional study
    Nitsch, Dorothea
    Mann, Andrea G.
    Bulpitt, Christopher
    Roderick, Paul J.
    Fletcher, Astrid
    AGE AND AGEING, 2011, 40 (03) : 381 - 387
  • [29] Depression, Loneliness and Quality of Life in Institutionalised and Non-Institutionalised Older Adults in Portugal: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Silva, Celso
    Ferreira, Rogerio
    Morgado, Bruno
    Alves, Elisabete
    Fonseca, Cesar
    NURSING REPORTS, 2024, 14 (03) : 2340 - 2354
  • [30] Relationship between health status and loneliness among Kazak older adults in Iran: A cross-sectional study on their sense of loneliness
    Abdolrahim Asadollahi
    Ogholgol Ghajari
    Mahsa Yarelahi
    Abedin Bakht Abnoos
    Abdurrahman Charkazi
    Current Psychology, 2023, 42 : 20824 - 20832