Induction of labor: The misoprostol controversy

被引:19
作者
Goldberg, AB
Wing, DA
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Planned Parenthood League Massachusetts, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Good Samaritan Hosp, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
misoprostol; pregnancy; labor; induction; cervix; abortion;
D O I
10.1016/S1526-9523(03)00087-4
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Misoprostol (Cytotec) is safe and effective for induction of labor, although it is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in pregnancy. In August 2000, the manufacturer of misoprostol warned against its use in pregnancy because of its abortifacient properties and cited reports of maternal and fetal deaths when misoprostol was used to induce labor, fueling the misoprostol controversy. More than 45 randomized trials including more than 5400 women have found vaginal misoprostol to be more effective than oxytocin or vaginal prostaglandin E2 at effecting vaginal delivery within 24 hours. Cesarean delivery rates with vaginal misoprostol are lower than with oxytocin alone, but similar to prostaglandin E2. There have been no significant differences in the frequency of serious adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes with low-dose misoprostol compared with oxytocin or prostaglandin E2; however, the relative risk of rare adverse outcomes with misoprostol is unknown. The data suggest that absolute risks are low when misoprostol is used appropriately. We recommend 25 mcg vaginally every 4 to 6 hours for carefully selected patients in closely monitored settings. Whether misoprostol will prove to be the most cost-effective agent for inducing labor in women with an unfavorable cervix remains to be determined. (C) 2003 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 248
页数:5
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
ALFIREVIC Z, 2001, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, P2
[2]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 1999, 228 ACOG COMM
[3]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 2002, 248 ACOG COMM
[4]   Uterine rupture during induction of labor at term with intravaginal misoprostol [J].
Bennett, BB .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (05) :832-833
[5]   Misoprostol for women's health: A review [J].
Blanchard, K ;
Clark, S ;
Winikoff, B ;
Gaines, G ;
Kabani, G ;
Shannon, C .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (02) :316-332
[6]   A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices [J].
Buser, D ;
Mora, G ;
Arias, F .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (04) :581-585
[7]   Buccal versus intravaginal misoprostol administration for cervical ripening [J].
Carlan, SJ ;
Blust, D ;
O'Brien, WF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (02) :229-233
[8]   The epidemiology of labor induction: Arizona, 1997 [J].
Coonrod, DV ;
Bay, RC ;
Kishi, GY .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (06) :1355-1360
[9]  
CULLEN M, 2000, COMMUNICATION 0823
[10]   INTRAVAGINAL MISOPROSTOL AS A CERVICAL RIPENING AGENT [J].
FLETCHER, HM ;
MITCHELL, S ;
SIMEON, D ;
FREDERICK, J ;
BROWN, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1993, 100 (07) :641-644