Technological innovation in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS): An organizational ecology perspective

被引:34
作者
Cui, Yu [1 ]
Jiao, Jie [2 ]
Jiao, Hao [3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Informat Sci & Technol Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Business, 19 Xinjie Kou Wai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Technological innovation; BRICS; Organizational ecology; Resources; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; DYNAMICS; PRODUCT; IMPACT; CERTIFICATION; GOVERNMENT; CAPACITY; INDUSTRY; VENTURES; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2016.02.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigates how a firm's engagement in technological innovation in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) is shaped by its organizational attributes. Drawing on the logic of organizational ecology theory, we suggest that a firm's engagement in technological innovation is influenced by its (1) organizational resource and capability (e.g., product certificate and employee training), (2) transactional-based competition (e.g., sales to government and export ratio), and (3) ownership structure (e.g., public listing, foreign ownership, and government ownership). Using the World Bank's data, we analyzed firms in BRICS economies and found partial support for the hypotheses. The results suggest that in BRICS economies, firms with more investment in employee training beyond on the job training and product certificates and that are publicly listed will have higher probability of engaging in technological innovation. Moreover, firms with a higher export ratio and a higher government ownership share will have lower probability of engaging in technological innovation. These results suggest that a firm's engagement in technological innovation is, at least in part, an organizational phenomenon influenced by the firm's resource conditions, required legitimization in the market, and founding conditions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 36
页数:9
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Training and innovation in an imperfect labour market [J].
Acemoglu, D .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1997, 64 (03) :445-464
[2]  
Acharya V., 2013, 19708 NBER
[3]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[4]  
Aiken L.S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interaction
[5]  
Aldrich H.E., 1993, ADV ENTREPRENEURSHIP, P145
[6]   Organizational ecology: Past, present, and future directions [J].
Amburgey, TL ;
Rao, H .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (05) :1265-1286
[7]   Does the innovator role affect the perceived potential for growth? Analysis of four types of new, technology-based firms [J].
Autio, E ;
Lumme, A .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 1998, 10 (01) :41-54
[8]   Toward an institutional ecology of organizational founding [J].
Baum, JAC ;
Oliver, C .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (05) :1378-1427
[9]   ORGANIZATIONAL NICHES AND THE DYNAMICS OF ORGANIZATIONAL FOUNDING [J].
BAUM, JAC ;
SINGH, JV .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1994, 5 (04) :483-501
[10]   INSTITUTIONAL EMBEDDEDNESS AND THE DYNAMICS OF ORGANIZATIONAL POPULATIONS [J].
BAUM, JAC ;
OLIVER, C .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1992, 57 (04) :540-559