Access-site complications after rescue percutaneous coronary intervention during thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction

被引:3
作者
Germing, A [1 ]
Lindstaedt, M [1 ]
Ulrich, S [1 ]
Bojara, W [1 ]
Lawo, T [1 ]
Mügge, A [1 ]
Grewe, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Med Klin 2, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Kliniken Bergmannsheil, D-44789 Bochum, Germany
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE | 2005年 / 94卷 / 01期
关键词
access-site complications; thrombolysis; percutaneous coronary intervention;
D O I
10.1007/s00392-005-0162-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
El Summary Aggressive antithrombotic medical therapy may increase the rate of access-site complications after percutaneous coronary intervention. Frequently, emergency coronary interventions have to be performed in a situation when thrombolysis therapy was administered as the first-line therapeutic approach in acute myocardial infarction but failed to achieve stable conditions. We analyzed the rate of femoral bleeding complications after emergency coronary intervention in 76 consecutive patients with unsuccessful thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. All invasive procedures were performed in a time period no longer than eight hours after thrombolysis was administered. Additional antithrombotic therapy with heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa-inhibitors was given during intervention in 100% and 38.2% of patients, respectively. in three patients (3.9%) femoral hematomas without therapeutic consequences were documented; one patient (1.3%) developed a hematoma requiring blood transfusion. A pseudoaneurysm, fistula or surgical vascular intervention did not occur. Coronary interventional procedures in rescue situations can be performed with excellent safety with respect to access-site bleeding complications even under anti-conditions of ongoing thrombolysis therapy and aggressive anti- thrombotic medical regimens.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 27
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Femoral haemostasis after transcatheter therapeutic intervention: a prospective randomised study of the angio-seal device vs. the femostop device [J].
Amin, FR ;
Yousufuddin, M ;
Stables, R ;
Shamim, W ;
Al-Nasser, F ;
Coats, AJS ;
Clague, J ;
Sigwart, U .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 76 (2-3) :235-240
[2]  
BERGE PG, 1993, Z KARDIOL, V82, P449
[3]  
Carere RG, 1998, CATHETER CARDIO DIAG, V43, P124, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199802)43:2<124::AID-CCD2>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-C
[5]  
Carey D, 2001, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V52, P3, DOI 10.1002/1522-726X(200101)52:1<3::AID-CCD1002>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-G
[7]  
Chamberlin JR, 1999, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V47, P143, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(199906)47:2<143::AID-CCD1>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-M
[9]   Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devices [J].
Dangas, G ;
Mehran, R ;
Kokolis, S ;
Feldman, D ;
Satler, LF ;
Pichard, AD ;
Kent, KM ;
Lansky, AJ ;
Stone, GW ;
Leon, MB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 38 (03) :638-641
[10]   POSTANGIOGRAPHIC FEMORAL-ARTERY INJURIES - NONSURGICAL REPAIR WITH US-GUIDED COMPRESSION [J].
FELLMETH, BD ;
ROBERTS, AC ;
BOOKSTEIN, JJ ;
FREISCHLAG, JA ;
FORSYTHE, JR ;
BUCKNER, NK ;
HYE, RJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 178 (03) :671-675