Premedication with orally administered midazolam in adults undergoing diagnostic upper endoscopy: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial

被引:29
作者
Mui, LM
Teoh, AYB
Ng, EKW [1 ]
Lee, YT
Yeung, ACMA
Chan, YL
Lau, JYW
Chung, SCS
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Surg, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Endoscopy Ctr, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Alice Ho Mui Lin Nethersole Hosp, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02590-8
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A double-blind placebo-controlled randornized trial was conducted to investigate the safety and the efficacy of orally administered midazolam as premedication for patients undergoing elective EGD. Methods: A total of 130 patients were randomized to receive either 7.5 mg of midazolam orally (n = 65) or a placebo (n = 65) as premedication. Outcomes measures included the anxiety score (visual analog scale) during EGD, overall tolerance, extent of amnesia, overall satisfaction, patient willingness to repeat the procedure, recovery time, and hemodynamic changes after medication. Results: The median (interquartile range) anxiety score during the procedure in the miclazolam group was significantly lower than that in the control group (2.0 [0-4.9] vs. 3.8 [2.1-7.95],p < 0.001). A significantly greater number of patients in the midazolam group graded overall tolerance as "excellent or good" (70.8% vs. 49.2%, p = 0.012) and reported a partial to complete amnesia response (52.3% vs. 32.3%, P = 0.02) when compared with the control group. Patients in the midazolam group were more willing to repeat the procedure if necessary (89.2% vs. 69.2%, p = 0.005). The median (interquartile range) recovery time was significantly longer in the miclazolam group than in the Control group (5 [5-15] minutes vs. 5 [5-10] minutes, p = 0.014). There were no statistically significant differences in satisfaction score and hemodynamic changes between groups. Conclusions: Premedication by oral administration of midazolam is a safe and an effective method of sedation that significantly reduces anxiety and improves overall tolerance for patients undergoing EGD.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 200
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Predicting which patients can undergo upper endoscopy comfortably without conscious sedation [J].
Abraham, N ;
Barkun, A ;
LaRocque, M ;
Fallone, C ;
Mayrand, S ;
Baffis, V ;
Cohen, A ;
Daly, D ;
Daoud, H ;
Joseph, L .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (02) :180-189
[3]   MIDAZOLAM KINETICS [J].
ALLONEN, H ;
ZIEGLER, G ;
KLOTZ, U .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1981, 30 (05) :653-661
[4]   INTRAVENOUS MIDAZOLAM FOR UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY - A STUDY OF 800 CONSECUTIVE CASES RELATING DOSE TO AGE AND SEX OF PATIENT [J].
BELL, GD ;
SPICKETT, GP ;
REEVE, PA ;
MORDEN, A ;
LOGAN, RFA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1987, 23 (02) :241-243
[5]   Midazolam sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in older persons: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [J].
Christe, C ;
Janssens, JP ;
Armenian, B ;
Herrmann, F ;
Vogt, N .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2000, 48 (11) :1398-1403
[6]   SEDATION FOR UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY - RESULTS OF A NATIONWIDE SURVEY [J].
DANESHMEND, TK ;
BELL, GD ;
LOGAN, RFA .
GUT, 1991, 32 (01) :12-15
[7]   SEDATION FOR UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY - A COMPARISON OF ORAL TEMAZEPAM AND IV DIAZEPAM [J].
DOUGLAS, JG ;
NIMMO, WS ;
WANLESS, R ;
JARVIE, DR ;
HEADING, RC ;
FINLAYSON, NDC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1980, 52 (08) :811-815
[8]   A prospective, randomized controlled trial of sedation vs. no sedation in outpatient diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy [J].
Fisher, NC ;
Bailey, S ;
Gibson, JA .
ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 30 (01) :21-24
[9]   CONSCIOUS SEDATION FOR GASTROSCOPY - PATIENT TOLERANCE AND CARDIORESPIRATORY PARAMETERS [J].
FROEHLICH, F ;
SCHWIZER, W ;
THORENS, J ;
KOHLER, M ;
GONVERS, JJ ;
FRIED, M .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 108 (03) :697-704
[10]   ORAL SEDATION FOR DIAGNOSTIC UPPER ENDOSCOPY [J].
HEDENBRO, JL ;
EKELUND, M ;
ABERG, T ;
LINDBLOM, A .
ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 23 (01) :8-10