Do Age-Friendly Rural Communities Affect Quality of Life? A Comparison of Perceptions from Middle-Aged and Older Adults in China

被引:15
作者
Yu, Jingyu [1 ]
Ma, Guixia [1 ]
Wang, Shuxia [2 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China
[2] Suzhou Univ, Suzhou 234000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
age-friendly communities; older adults; quality of life; rural community; WORLD-HEALTH-ORGANIZATION; AREAS; URBAN; NETWORKS; PEOPLE; WHOQOL; POLICY; WELL;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph18147283
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aging population in rural areas of China faces serious challenges due to urban-rural disparities. In order to improve the active aging of rural older adults, the establishment of age-friendly communities is encouraged. However, globally, the focus is on age-friendly communities in urban areas, not reflecting rural communities. Hence, we addressed the importance of age-friendly rural communities (AFRCs) and aimed to investigate their impact on the quality of life (QoL) of older adults. We examined different perceptions of AFRCs among older adults (aged over 60) and middle-aged people (45-60) in rural communities with questionnaire surveys (n = 470 and 393, respectively). Several statistical methods, such as Chi-squared test, t-test, reliability test, and multiple regression, were adopted to investigate and compare the perceptions of these two. The results indicated that (1) middle-aged people were more satisfied with AFRC components and had a higher QoL than older adults; (2) the QoL of middle-aged people was predicted by housing, accessibility, and outdoor spaces; (3) the QoL of older adults was affected by housing, outdoor spaces, social participation, and public transportation. These findings aid in our understanding of rural communities and the QoL of rural residents. They are helpful for urban planners and policymakers to improve the planning of AFRCs and supplement research on age-friendly communities in rural areas. Practical implementations are proposed for the planning of AFRCs, such as the passive design of residential housing, grouping of community facilities together, and improvement in the hygiene of outdoor spaces in rural areas.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Aird Rosemary L, 2015, J Aging Res, V2015, P501823, DOI 10.1155/2015/501823
[2]  
[Anonymous], GUID PROM AG FRIENDL
[3]  
[Anonymous], this handbook for a discussion of measuring inattention in a variety of domains including sales taxes
[4]   Influences of rural built environment on travel mode choice of rural residents: The case of rural Sichuan [J].
Ao, Yibin ;
Zhang, Yuting ;
Wang, Yan ;
Chen, Yunfeng ;
Yang, Linchuan .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 85
[5]   Changing Practice and Policy to Move to Scale: A Framework for Age-Friendly Communities Across the United States [J].
Ball, M. Scott ;
Lawler, Kathryn .
JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY, 2014, 26 (1-2) :19-32
[6]   The design of caring environments and the quality of life of older people [J].
Barnes, S .
AGEING & SOCIETY, 2002, 22 :775-789
[7]   Adapting to challenge: Examining older adult transportation in rural communities [J].
Bond M. ;
Brown J.R. ;
Wood J. .
Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2017, 5 (04) :707-715
[8]   Community-level factors that contribute to First Nations and Inuit older adults feeling supported to age well in a Canadian city [J].
Brooks-Cleator, Lauren A. ;
Giles, Audrey R. ;
Flaherty, Martha .
JOURNAL OF AGING STUDIES, 2019, 48 :50-59
[9]   Physical Activity Policy for Older Adults in the Northwest Territories, Canada: Gaps and Opportunities for Gains [J].
Brooks-Cleator, Lauren A. ;
Giles, Audrey R. .
ARCTIC, 2016, 69 (02) :169-176
[10]   Age-friendly communities and perceived disconnectedness: the role of built environment and social engagement [J].
Cao, Qiuchang ;
Dabelko-Schoeny, Holly I. ;
White, Katie M. ;
Choi, Mi-Sun .
JOURNAL OF AGING AND HEALTH, 2020, 32 (09) :937-948