Classification of Soils into Hydrologic Groups Using Machine Learning

被引:46
作者
Abraham, Shiny [1 ]
Chau Huynh [1 ]
Huy Vu [1 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Seattle, WA 98122 USA
关键词
multi-class classification; soil texture calculator; k-Nearest Neighbors; support vector machines; decision trees; ensemble learning;
D O I
10.3390/data5010002
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Hydrologic soil groups play an important role in the determination of surface runoff, which, in turn, is crucial for soil and water conservation efforts. Traditionally, placement of soil into appropriate hydrologic groups is based on the judgement of soil scientists, primarily relying on their interpretation of guidelines published by regional or national agencies. As a result, large-scale mapping of hydrologic soil groups results in widespread inconsistencies and inaccuracies. This paper presents an application of machine learning for classification of soil into hydrologic groups. Based on features such as percentages of sand, silt and clay, and the value of saturated hydraulic conductivity, machine learning models were trained to classify soil into four hydrologic groups. The results of the classification obtained using algorithms such as k-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machine with Gaussian Kernel, Decision Trees, Classification Bagged Ensembles and TreeBagger (Random Forest) were compared to those obtained using estimation based on soil texture. The performance of these models was compared and evaluated using per-class metrics and micro- and macro-averages. Overall, performance metrics related to kNN, Decision Tree and TreeBagger exceeded those for SVM-Gaussian Kernel and Classification Bagged Ensemble. Among the four hydrologic groups, it was noticed that group B had the highest rate of false positives.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [11] da Silva BGC, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI [10.1038/s41598-019-50376-w, 10.1038/s41598-019-41935-2]
  • [12] de Nooy G, 1997, NIJHOFF LAW SPEC, V31, P1
  • [13] High Resolution Mapping of Soil Properties Using Remote Sensing Variables in South-Western Burkina Faso: A Comparison of Machine Learning and Multiple Linear Regression Models
    Forkuor, Gerald
    Hounkpatin, Ozias K. L.
    Welp, Gerhard
    Thiel, Michael
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01):
  • [14] An overview and comparison of machine-learning techniques for classification purposes in digital soil mapping
    Heung, Brandon
    Ho, Hung Chak
    Zhang, Jin
    Knudby, Anders
    Bulmer, Chuck E.
    Schmidt, Margaret G.
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2016, 265 : 62 - 77
  • [15] Estimation of global SCS curve numbers using satellite remote sensing and geospatial data
    Hong, Y.
    Adler, R. F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2008, 29 (02) : 471 - 477
  • [16] Huffman R.L., 2013, Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, V7, P81, DOI [10.13031/swce.2013.5, DOI 10.13031/SWCE.2013.5]
  • [17] Illés G, 2011, CAN J SOIL SCI, V91, P615, DOI [10.4141/cjss2010-007, 10.4141/CJSS2010-007]
  • [18] Knox SW, 2018, WILEY SER PROBAB ST, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781119439868
  • [19] A semi-distributed approach to rainfall-runoff modelling - a case study in a snow affected catchment
    Kokkonen, T
    Koivusalo, H
    Karvonen, T
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2001, 16 (05) : 481 - 493
  • [20] Kruger F., 2016, THESIS