Towards the mitigation of distributed denial-of-service cyberbioattacks in bacteria-based biosensing systems

被引:2
|
作者
Lopez Bernal, Sergio [1 ]
Martins, Daniel Perez [2 ]
Celdran, Alberto Huertas [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Murcia, Dept Ingn Informac & Comunicac, Murcia 30100, Spain
[2] Waterford Inst Technol, VistaMilk Res Ctr & Walton Inst, Waterford X91 P20H, Ireland
[3] Univ Zurich UZH, Dept Informat IfI, Commun Syst Grp CSG, CH-8050 Zurich, Switzerland
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Bacteria; Biofilm; Engineered cells; Cyberbiosecurity; DDoS; Mitigation; GUT-BRAIN AXIS; MOLECULAR COMMUNICATIONS; COMMUNICATION; SECURITY; INTERNET; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.dsp.2021.103241
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
In recent years, bacterial populations have been engineered to act as biological sensors able to improve human health by developing novel therapeutics and diagnostics. Nowadays, populations of engineered bacteria can be remotely controlled to perform some medical actions on-demand; however, it brings crucial concerns from the cybersecurity perspective. As an example, one of the first cyberbioattacks has been recently proposed to explore the feasibility of using engineered bacteria to produce a Distributed Denial-of-Service and disrupt the creation of biofilm, a natural protection of bacteria against external agents. With the goal of mitigating the impact of this cyberbioattack, this paper proposes two novel mitigation mechanisms: quorum quenching and amplification. On the one hand, quorum quenching focuses on emitting molecules to block those sent by the cyberbioattack. On the other hand, the amplification approach emits molecules to increase the percentage of those needed to create the biofilm structure. To measure the performance of both mitigation techniques in dynamic scenarios, we have implemented different configurations of the Distributed Denial-of-Service attack and evaluated the channel attenuation and the signal-to-interference-plus-noise (SINR). As a result, we have observed that both approaches reduce the impact caused by the cyberbioattack, detecting differences between them. The quorum quenching mechanism presented better results, although it did not adapt its behavior to different attack configurations, responding statically. In contrast, the amplitude mitigation technique is perfectly adapted to attack configurations with different impacts on biofilm creation. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the Move: Evading Distributed Denial-of-Service Attacks
    Stavrou, Angelos
    Fleck, Daniel
    Kolias, Constantinos
    COMPUTER, 2016, 49 (03) : 104 - 107
  • [2] A survey of distributed denial-of-service attack, prevention, and mitigation techniques
    Mahjabin, Tasnuva
    Xiao, Yang
    Sun, Guang
    Jiang, Wangdong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISTRIBUTED SENSOR NETWORKS, 2017, 13 (12):
  • [3] A Comprehensive Review of Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Attacks: Techniques and Mitigation Strategies
    Alomari, Mariam
    Alsadah, Sharifa
    Aldahmash, Noura
    Alghulaygah, Hana
    Alogaiel, Razan
    Saqib, Nazar Abbas
    PROCEEDINGS 2024 SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL WOMEN IN DATA SCIENCE CONFERENCE AT PRINCE SULTAN UNIVERSITY, WIDS-PSU 2024, 2024, : 215 - 222
  • [4] A Low-Cost Distributed Denial-of-Service Attack Architecture
    Huang, Kaifan
    Yang, Lu-Xing
    Yang, Xiaofan
    Xiang, Yong
    Tang, Yuan Yan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 42111 - 42119
  • [5] Detection and Mitigation of Low-Rate Denial-of-Service Attacks: A Survey
    Rios, Vinicius De Miranda
    Inacio, Pedro R. M.
    Magoni, Damien
    Freire, Mario M.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 76648 - 76668
  • [6] Toward a Distributed Approach for Detection and Mitigation of Denial-of-Service Attacks Within Industrial Internet of Things
    Borgiani, Vladimir
    Moratori, Patrick
    Kazienko, Juliano F.
    Tubino, Emilio R. R.
    Quincozes, Silvio E.
    IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 2021, 8 (06) : 4569 - 4578
  • [7] Distributed denial-of-service attack mitigation in network functions virtualization-based 5G networks using management and orchestration
    Koksal, Sarp
    Dalveren, Yaser
    Maiga, Bamoye
    Kara, Ali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 34 (09)
  • [8] IP Address-Based Mitigation Against Denial-of-Service Flooding Attacks
    Patil, Arvind R. Bhagat
    Thakur, Nileshsingh, V
    INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY FOR INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, ICTIS 2018, VOL 2, 2019, 107 : 377 - 389
  • [9] Preventing Distributed Denial-of-Service Flooding Attacks With Dynamic Path Identifiers
    Luo, Hongbin
    Chen, Zhe
    Li, Jiawei
    Vasilakos, Athanasios V.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION FORENSICS AND SECURITY, 2017, 12 (08) : 1801 - 1815
  • [10] Optimal Filter Assignment Policy Against Distributed Denial-of-Service Attack
    Biswas, Rajorshi
    Wu, Jie
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DEPENDABLE AND SECURE COMPUTING, 2022, 19 (01) : 339 - 352