Influence of Enema and Dietary Restrictions on Prostate MR Image Quality: A Multireader Study

被引:21
作者
Purysko, Andrei S. [1 ,2 ]
Mielke, Nathan [1 ]
Bullen, Jennifer [3 ]
Nachand, Douglas [1 ]
Rizk, Alain [1 ]
Stevens, Erica [4 ]
Ward, Ryan D. [1 ]
Klein, Eric A. [2 ]
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. [5 ]
Ream, Justin M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Imaging Inst, 9500 Euclid Ave,JB-322, Cleveland, OH 44145 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Cleveland, OH 44145 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44145 USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Sch Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[5] NYU Langone Hlth, Dept Radiol, New York, NY USA
关键词
Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prostate; Enema; SYSTEM; COIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2020.10.019
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of enema and dietary restrictions on prostate MR image quality metrics and to assess inter-reader agreement for these metrics. Methods: This retrospective study included 195 men divided into groups based on their compliance with preparation instructions before prostate MRI (Enema + Diet, n = 98; Enema, n = 42; Diet, n = 35; Control [no compliance], n = 20). Four readers independently assessed six image quality metrics on a 5-point scale. Between-group comparisons were made using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Inter-reader agreement was calculated using Fleiss' kappa. Results: Compared with the Control group, image quality with respect to rectal stool/gas, distortion of diffusion-weighted images, overall image quality, and confidence in assessment was higher in the Enema + Diet, Enema, and Diet groups (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). The Enema + Diet and Enema groups had significantly higher scores than the Diet group for rectal stool/gas (p < 0.001 and 0.005, respectively). The Enema + Diet and Diet groups had higher scores than the Control group for rectal peristalsis (p = 0.027 and 0.009, respectively), but there were no significant differences in motion artifacts on T2-weighted images. Agreement among readers was fair, with kappa values ranging from 0.25 to 0.37. Conclusion: Enema and dietary restriction can improve the quality of prostate MRI by decreasing rectal distension and distortion of diffusion-weighted images and by increasing reader confidence in image assessment. Inter-reader agreement using subjective criteria for analysis of MRI quality is fair.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 14
页数:11
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PROSTATE IMAGING REP
[2]   Comparison of image quality and patient discomfort in prostate MRI: pelvic phased array coil vs. endorectal coil [J].
Barth, Borna K. ;
Cornelius, Alexander ;
Nanz, Daniel ;
Eberli, Daniel ;
Donati, Olivio F. .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 41 (11) :2218-2226
[3]   Impact of bowel preparation with Fleet's™ enema on prostate MRI quality [J].
Coskun, Mehmet ;
Mehralivand, Sherif ;
Shih, Joanna H. ;
Merino, Maria J. ;
Wood, Bradford J. ;
Pinto, Peter A. ;
Barrett, Tristan ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Turkbey, Baris .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (12) :4252-4259
[4]   ESUR/ESUI consensus statements on multi-parametric MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: quality requirements for image acquisition, interpretation and radiologists' training [J].
de Rooij, Maarten ;
Israel, Bas ;
Tummers, Marcia ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Barrett, Tristan ;
Giganti, Francesco ;
Hamm, Bernd ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Padhani, Anwar ;
Panebianco, Valeria ;
Puech, Philippe ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Salomon, Georg ;
Schoots, Ivo ;
Veltman, Jeroen ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Walz, Jochen ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (10) :5404-5416
[5]   Increasing Utilization of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance [J].
Fam, Mina M. ;
Yabes, Jonathan G. ;
Macleod, Liam C. ;
Bandari, Jathin ;
Turner, Robert M., II ;
Lopa, Samia H. ;
Furlan, Alessandro ;
Filson, Christopher P. ;
Davies, Benjamin J. ;
Jacobs, Bruce L. .
UROLOGY, 2019, 130 :99-104
[6]   Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL): A New Quality Control Scoring System for Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate from the PRECISION trial [J].
Giganti, Francesco ;
Allen, Clare ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Moore, Caroline M. ;
Kasivisvanathan, Veeru .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (05) :615-619
[7]   Does a cleansing enema improve image quality of 3T surface coil multiparametric prostate MRI? [J].
Lim, Christopher ;
Quon, Jeff ;
McInnes, Matt ;
Shabana, Wael M. ;
El-Khodary, Mohamed ;
Schieda, Nicola .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (03) :689-697
[8]   Dramatic increase in the utilization of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection and management of prostate cancer [J].
Oberlin, Daniel T. ;
Casalino, David D. ;
Miller, Frank H. ;
Meeks, Joshua J. .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 42 (04) :1255-1258
[9]   Evaluating the effect of rectal distension and rectal movement on prostate gland position using cine MRI [J].
Padhani, AR ;
Khoo, VS ;
Suckling, J ;
Husband, JE ;
Leach, MO ;
Dearnaley, DP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 44 (03) :525-533
[10]   Rectal gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on prostate diffusion-weighted MRI with epi read-out at 3.0 T: does a preparatory micro-enema improve image quality? [J].
Plodeck, Verena ;
Radosa, Christoph Georg ;
Huebner, Hans-Martin ;
Baldus, Christian ;
Borkowetz, Angelika ;
Thomas, Christian ;
Kuehn, Jens-Peter ;
Laniado, Michael ;
Hoffmann, Ralf-Thorsten ;
Platzek, Ivan .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (12) :4244-4251