Standalone titanium/polyetheretherketone interbody cage for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Clinical and radiological results at 24 months

被引:1
作者
Mobbs, Ralph J. [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Amin, Tajrian [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Phan, Kevin [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Al Khawaja, Darweesh [3 ]
Choy, Wen Jie [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Parr, William C. H. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Lovric, Vedran [1 ,4 ]
Walsh, William R. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales UNSW, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] NeuroSpine Surg Res Grp NSURG, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Nepean Neurosurg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Prince Wales Hosp, Surg Orthoped Res Lab SORL, Randwick, NSW, Australia
[5] Prince Wales Private Hosp, NeuroSpine Clin, Randwick, NSW, Australia
关键词
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion; bone morphogenetic protein-2; integral fixation; polyetheretherketone; supercritical CO2 allograft; titanium; PEEK; DISKECTOMY; TRAUMA; SPINE;
D O I
10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_133_21
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Context: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a common procedure for patients suffering degenerative, deformity, or posttraumatic pathologies of the lumbar spine. Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a combination Titanium/Polyetheretherketone (Ti/PEEK) 3-screw fixation ALIF cage. Settings and Design: This was a prospective multisurgeon series of 87 patients (105 implants), with a minimum 24-month follow-up. Twelve patients (12/87) were supplemented with posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for additional stability for pars defect spondylolisthesis correction. Radiological follow-up with fine-cut computed tomography (CT) scan occurred at 4-6 months, and again at 18-24 months if no fusion observed on initial CT, was performed to evaluate early and final fusion rates, and integration of the Ti/PEEK cage at the end-plate junction. Clinical follow-up included the subjective measures of pain and functional status and objective wearable device monitoring. Results: The fusion rate was 85% (97/105 implants) 6 months postoperatively, with no implant-related complications, and 95% at 24 months, based on independent radiological assessment. Patients experienced statistically significant improvement in subjective pain and functional outcomes compared to preoperative status. The objective measures revealed a daily step count with a 27% improvement, and gait velocity with a mean increase from 0.97 m/s to 1.18 m/s, at 3 months postoperatively. Conclusions: A Ti/PEEK cage, with allograft and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), achieved rapid interbody progression to fusion and is an effective implant for use in anterior lumbar surgery with high early fusion rates and no peri-endplate lucency. Supercritical CO2 allograft provided an osteoconductive scaffold and combined well with BMP-2 to facilitate fusion.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 47
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Anterior cervical interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cage filled with synthetic bone graft in acute cervical spine injury
    Hattou, L.
    Morandi, X.
    Lefebvre, J.
    Le Reste, P. -J.
    Riffaud, L.
    Henaux, P. -L.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2017, 103 (01) : 61 - 66
  • [32] Comparison of Fusion, Subsidence, and Clinical Results Between 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage and Polyetheretherketone Cage in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Minimum of 2 Years Follow-Up
    Yang, Jae Jun
    Kim, Dong -Min
    Park, Sehan
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 177 : E732 - E741
  • [33] Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: stand-alone interbody cage versus interbody cage with pedicle screw fixation - a finite element analysis
    Choi, Kyung-Chul
    Ryu, Kyeong-Sik
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    Kim, Yeong Hyeon
    Lee, Sung Jae
    Park, Chun-Kun
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2013, 14
  • [34] Risk factors for polyetheretherketone cage subsidence following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Weerasak Singhatanadgige
    Amnat Sukthuayat
    Terdpong Tanaviriyachai
    Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
    Teerachat Tanasansomboon
    Stephen J. Kerr
    Worawat Limthongkul
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2021, 163 : 2557 - 2565
  • [35] Risk factors for polyetheretherketone cage subsidence following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Singhatanadgige, Weerasak
    Sukthuayat, Amnat
    Tanaviriyachai, Terdpong
    Kongtharvonskul, Jatupon
    Tanasansomboon, Teerachat
    Kerr, Stephen J.
    Limthongkul, Worawat
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2021, 163 (09) : 2557 - 2565
  • [36] Expandable Cage Technology-Transforaminal, Anterior, and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Macki, Mohamed
    Hamilton, Travis
    Haddad, Yazeed W.
    Chang, Victor
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 21 : S69 - S80
  • [37] Surgical Management of Minimally Invasive Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Stand-Alone Interbody Cage for L4-5 Degenerative Disorders: Clinical and Radiographic Findings
    Hironaka, Yasuo
    Morimoto, Tetsuya
    Motoyama, Yasushi
    Park, Young-Sue
    Nakase, Hiroyuki
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2013, 53 (12) : 861 - 869
  • [38] Salvage Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Pseudoarthrosis After Posterior or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Review of 10 Patients
    Yun, Dong-Ju
    Yu, Jae-Won
    Jeon, Sang-Hyeop
    Lee, Hyung-Chang
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 111 : E746 - E755
  • [39] History of Integral Fixation for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF): The Hartshill Horseshoe
    Choy, Wen Jie
    Abi-Hanna, David
    Cassar, Lachlan P.
    Hardcastle, Philip
    Phan, Kevin
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 129 : 394 - 400
  • [40] Complication avoidance and management in anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Than, Khoi D.
    Wang, Anthony C.
    Rahman, Shayan U.
    Wilson, Thomas J.
    Valdivia, Juan M.
    Park, Paul
    La Marca, Frank
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2011, 31 (04)