Survivorship care planning in gynecologic oncologyperspectives from patients, caregivers, and health care providers

被引:25
|
作者
de Rooij, Belle H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thomas, Teresa Hagan [4 ]
Post, Kathryn E. [1 ,5 ]
Flanagan, Jane [1 ,5 ]
Ezendam, Nicole P. M. [1 ,2 ]
Peppercorn, Jeffrey [1 ]
Dizon, Don S. [6 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Ctr Canc, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Tilburg Univ, Dept Med & Clin Psychol, CoRPS Ctr Res Psychol Somat Dis, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[5] Boston Coll, William F Connell Sch Nursing, Boston, MA USA
[6] Brown Univ, Rhode Isl Hosp, Lifespan Canc Inst, Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI 02903 USA
关键词
Cancer survivorship; Survivorship care; Survivorship care plan; Gynecologic cancer; Qualitative research; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER SURVIVORS; OVARIAN-CANCER; REPORTED OUTCOMES; FOLLOW-UP; PLANS; WOMEN; SYMPTOMS; IMPACT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s11764-018-0713-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeThis qualitative study sought to describe the challenges following treatment and the preferences regarding survivorship care among patients treated for gynecological cancer, their caregivers, and health care providers.MethodsBetween July and August 2017, in-depth semi-structured interviews regarding survivorship were conducted at a large academic hospital in the USA among patients who recently completed treatment (<12months) for a gynecological cancer (ovarian, endometrial, cervical, and vulvar) and their primary caregivers. A focus group was conducted among health care providers (oncologists, nurses, and fellows). Main themes were identified using descriptive content analysis.ResultsA total of 30 individuals participated in this study (13 patients, 9 caregivers, 8 health care providers). Almost all participants reported a desire for more information on how to address survivorship needs, specifically as they related to side effects, follow-up schedule, and psychological assistance. Despite this uniformly identified need for more information, preferences for survivorship care planning differed across cancer types and individuals, with respect to content, timing, and mode of delivery. Health care providers expressed challenges in communicating with patients about survivorship, a desire to shift post-treatment conversations to the goal of improving quality of life as opposed to focusing on disease recurrence, and an unmet need for disease specific and individualized survivorship care planning.ConclusionsPatients, caregivers, and health care providers each expressed a need for gynecologic cancer-tailored survivorship care resources.Implications for Cancer SurvivorsThe variation of disease types and patient and caregiver needs may require multi-faceted, individualized survivorship care planning.
引用
收藏
页码:762 / 774
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Oncological healthcare providers’ perspectives on appropriate melanoma survivorship care: a qualitative focus group study
    Nadia C. W. Kamminga
    Marlies Wakkee
    Rianne J. De Bruin
    Astrid. A. M. van der Veldt
    Arjen Joosse
    Suzan W. I. Reeder
    Peter W. Plaisier
    Tamar Nijsten
    Marjolein Lugtenberg
    BMC Cancer, 23
  • [42] Patient-Centered Support in the Survivorship Care Transition: Outcomes From the Patient-Owned Survivorship Care Plan Intervention
    Kvale, Elizabeth A.
    Huang, Chao-Hui Sylvia
    Meneses, Karen M.
    Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
    Bae, Sejong
    Azuero, Casey B.
    Rocque, Gabrielle B.
    Bevis, Kerri S.
    Ritchie, Christine S.
    CANCER, 2016, 122 (20) : 3232 - 3242
  • [43] Perspectives From Patients and Care Providers on the Management of Fecal Incontinence: A Needs Assessment
    Helewa, Ramzi M.
    Moloo, Husein
    Williams, Lara
    Foss, Kristine M.
    Baksh-Thomas, Waheeda
    Raiche, Isabelle
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (04) : 408 - 415
  • [44] Patients' information coping styles influence the benefit of a survivorship care plan in the ROGY Care Trial: New insights for tailored delivery
    de Rooij, Belle H.
    Ezendam, Nicole P. M.
    Vos, M. Caroline
    Pijnenborg, Johanna M. A.
    Boll, Dorry
    Kruitwagen, Roy F. P. M.
    van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V.
    CANCER, 2019, 125 (05) : 788 - 797
  • [45] Still Lost in Transition? Perspectives of Ongoing Cancer Survivorship Care Needs from Comprehensive Cancer Control Programs, Survivors, and Health Care Providers
    Ross, Leslie W.
    Townsend, Julie S.
    Rohan, Elizabeth A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (05)
  • [46] Health care providers' knowledge about contraceptive evidence: a barrier to quality family planning care?
    Dehlendorf, Christine
    Levy, Kira
    Ruskin, Rachel
    Steinauer, Jody
    CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 81 (04) : 292 - 298
  • [47] Social support from health care providers is associated with reduced illness intrusiveness in hemodialysis patients
    Neri, L.
    Brancaccio, D.
    Rey, L. A. Rocca
    Rossa, F.
    Martini, A.
    Andreucci, V. E.
    CLINICAL NEPHROLOGY, 2011, 75 (02) : 125 - 134
  • [48] Integrated psychological care in head and neck cancer: Views from health care providers, patients, and supports
    Jesse, Michelle T.
    Ryan, Michael E.
    Eshelman, Anne
    Ghanem, Tamer
    Williams, Amy M.
    Miller-Matero, Lisa R.
    Yaremchuk, Kathleen
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2015, 125 (06) : 1345 - 1351
  • [49] Childhood cancer survivorship care: A qualitative study of healthcare providers' professional preferences
    McLoone, Jordana K.
    Chen, Weihan
    Wakefield, Claire E.
    Johnston, Karen
    Bell, Rachael
    Thornton-Benko, Elysia
    Cohn, Richard J.
    Signorelli, Christina
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [50] Managing the long term care of inflammatory bowel disease patients: The cost to European health care providers
    Buchanan, James
    Wordsworth, Sarah
    Ahmad, Tariq
    Perrin, Angela
    Vermeire, Severine
    Sans, Miguel
    Taylor, Jenny
    Jewell, Derek
    JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2011, 5 (04) : 301 - 316