Environmental regulation and competitiveness in the mining industry: Permitting processes with special focus on Finland, Sweden and Russia

被引:56
作者
Soderholm, Kristina [1 ]
Soderholm, Patrik [1 ]
Helenius, Heidi [2 ]
Pettersson, Maria [1 ]
Viklund, Roine [1 ]
Masloboev, Vladimir [3 ]
Mingaleva, Tatiana [3 ]
Petrov, Viktor [3 ]
机构
[1] Lulea Univ Technol, Div Social Sci, S-95187 Lulea, Sweden
[2] Univ Lapland, Fac Law, Rovaniemi, Finland
[3] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Ind Ecol Problems North, Kola Sci Ctr, Apatity 184200, Russia
关键词
Environmental regulation; Mining industry; Competitiveness; Nordic countries; TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; SWEDISH; INNOVATION; POLICY; PERFORMANCE; EUROPE; GREEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.11.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper investigates to what extent and under what circumstances environmental regulation can be designed and implemented to jointly achieve positive environmental outcomes and sustained competitive strength in the mining industry. First the paper provides a conceptual analysis of the impacts of environmental regulations on mining competitiveness, including a discussion of how the environmental-competitiveness trade-off can be affected by various regulatory design and implementation strategies. Methodologically we distinguish between the flexibility, predictability and stringency of the regulations, and in a second step these analytical concepts are illustrated in the empirical context of the environmental permitting processes in Finland, Sweden and Russia. An important result is that in these countries there has been a lack of timeliness and predictability in the environmental regulations (e.g., uncertainty about the interpretation of the legislation, delays due to appeals etc.). These problems can in part be addressed by, for instance: (a) allocating more resources to the regulatory authorities; (b) establishing more consensus-based regulatory interactions between the mining industry and the authorities; and (c) introducing more standardized procedures and road maps for environmental impact assessments, permit applications and not the least for how to interpret specific legal rules in the context of mining. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 142
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Ambec S., 2011, The Porter Hypothesis at 20. Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?
[2]  
Annandale D., 2003, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V23, P383, DOI [10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00002-7, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00002-7]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Time strategies, innovation and environmental policy
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ENV POL REG RUSS IMP
[5]  
Ashford N.A., 2008, Environmental Law, Policy, and Economics: Reclaiming the Environmental Agenda, V1
[6]  
Beare M.J., 2009, COMP RUSSIAN INT APP
[7]  
Behre Dolbear (BD), 2014, 2014 RANK COUNTR MIN
[8]   Command-and-control revisited: Environmental compliance and technological change in Swedish industry 1970-1990 [J].
Bergquist, Ann-Kristin ;
Soderholm, Kristina ;
Kinneryd, Hanna ;
Lindmark, Magnus ;
Soderholm, Patrik .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 85 :6-19
[9]   Environmental Policy Without Costs? A Review of the Porter Hypothesis [J].
Brannlund, Runar ;
Lundgren, Tommy .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2009, 3 (02) :75-117
[10]  
Brickman Ronald., 1985, Controlling Chemicals: The Politics of Regulation in Europe and the United States