Short-term use of an exposed polypropylene barrier in the preservation of alveolar bone after extraction: randomized clinical trial

被引:1
作者
dos Santos, C. C., V [1 ]
Tonini, K. R. [1 ]
Silva, M. A. A. [1 ]
de Carvalho, P. S. P. [2 ]
Ponzoni, D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Diag & Surg, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Rua Jose Bonifacio 1193, BR-16015050 Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
alveolar bone loss; bone resorption; tooth extraction; polypropylene; membranes; TOOTH EXTRACTION; RIDGE PRESERVATION; DIMENSIONAL CHANGES; PLACEMENT; DEFECTS; SOCKETS; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijom.2021.02.005
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This study was performed to evaluate the short-term preservation of alveolar bone volume with or without a polypropylene barrier and exposure of the area after extractions. Thirty posterior tooth extraction sockets were distributed randomly to a control group (n = 15; extraction and suture) and a barrier group (n = 15; extraction, barrier, and suture). All sutures and barriers were removed 10 days postoperatively. Cone beam computed tomography scans taken with the aid of a tomographic guide were obtained preoperatively, immediately postoperative, and at 120 days postoperative. A visual analysis of the coronal sections of the alveolus was performed, and vertical loss in the mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual bone ridges and horizontal thickness were evaluated. The mean vertical loss after extraction did not differ significantly between the control and barrier groups (Student t-test: mesial P = 0.989, buccal P = 0.997, lingual/palatal P = 0.070, distal P = 0.107). The mean vertical loss at 120 days postoperative did not differ significantly between the control (0.65 mm) and barrier (0.52 mm) groups (P > 0.05), with an effect size of 0.13 mm. At 120 days, the barrier group presented a mean resorption in thickness (0.45 mm) that was significantly lower than that in the control group (0.76 mm) (P = 0.021), with an effect size of 0.31 mm. The polypropylene barrier reduced the horizontal resorption in sockets of posterior teeth after extraction.
引用
收藏
页码:1259 / 1266
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A prospective, randomized-controlled clinical trial to evaluate bone preservation using implants with different geometry placed into extraction sockets in the maxilla
    Sanz, Mariano
    Cecchinato, Denis
    Ferrus, Jorge
    Pjetursson, E. Bjarni
    Lang, Niklaus P.
    Lindhe, Jan
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (01) : 13 - 21
  • [32] Bone and Soft Tissue Modifications in Immediate Implants Versus Delayed Implants Inserted Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Part I: Esthetic Outcomes
    Cardaropoli, Daniele
    De Luca, Nicoletta
    Tamagnone, Lorenzo
    Leonardi, Rosalia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 42 (02) : 195 - 202
  • [33] An open randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate ridge preservation and repair using SocketKAPTM and SocketKAGET™: part 2-three-dimensional alveolar bone volumetric analysis of CBCT imaging
    Abdelhamid, Alaa
    Omran, Mostafa
    Bakhshalian, Neema
    Tarnow, Dennis
    Zadeh, Homayoun H.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (06) : 631 - 639
  • [34] Bone and Soft Tissue Modifications in Immediate Implants Versus Delayed Implants Inserted Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Part II: Radiographic Outcomes
    Cardaropoli, Daniele
    Bellomo, Miriana
    Tamagnone, Lorenzo
    Leonardi, Rosalia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 42 (04) : 487 - 494
  • [35] A 3-year prospective randomized clinical trial of alveolar bone crest response and clinical parameters through 1, 2, and 3 years of clinical function of implants placed 4 months after alveolar ridge preservation using two different allogeneic bone-grafting materials
    Solakoglu, Onder
    Ofluoglu, Duygu
    Schwarzenbach, Heidi
    Heydecke, Guido
    Reissmann, Daniel
    Ergun, Sertan
    Goetz, Werner
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [36] Randomized clinical trial comparing PEG-based synthetic to porcine-derived collagen membrane in the preservation of alveolar bone following tooth extraction in anterior maxilla
    Shahdad, Shakeel
    Gamble, Eugene
    Matani, Jay
    Zhang, Liang
    Gamboa, Ana
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (10) : 1010 - 1024
  • [37] Alveolar Preservation with Albumin and Gentamycin-Coated Allograft after Third Molar Tooth Removal: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Minya, Fanni
    Trimmel, Balint
    Simonffy, Laszlo
    Gyulai-Gaal, Szabolcs
    Lacza, Zsombor
    Dobo-Nagy, Csaba
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (02): : 1 - 14
  • [38] Ridge Preservation Using Demineralized Bone Matrix Gel With Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 After Tooth Extraction: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Kim, Yu-Jin
    Lee, Jeong-Yol
    Kim, Jong-Eun
    Park, Jung-Chul
    Shin, Sang-Wan
    Cho, Kyoo-Sung
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 72 (07) : 1281 - 1290
  • [39] Soft Tissue Dimensions Following Tooth Extraction in the Posterior Maxilla: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Alveolar Ridge Preservation to Spontaneous Healing
    Song, Young Woo
    Yoon, Sung-Wook
    Cha, Jae-Kook
    Jung, Ui-Won
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (08) : 1 - 12
  • [40] Buccal Bone Formation After Flapless Extraction: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2/Absorbable Collagen Carrier and Collagen Sponge Alone
    Coomes, Angela M.
    Mealey, Brian L.
    Huynh-Ba, Guy
    Barboza-Arguello, Concepcion
    Moore, William S.
    Cochran, David L.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2014, 85 (04) : 525 - 535