Short-term use of an exposed polypropylene barrier in the preservation of alveolar bone after extraction: randomized clinical trial

被引:1
|
作者
dos Santos, C. C., V [1 ]
Tonini, K. R. [1 ]
Silva, M. A. A. [1 ]
de Carvalho, P. S. P. [2 ]
Ponzoni, D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Diag & Surg, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Rua Jose Bonifacio 1193, BR-16015050 Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
alveolar bone loss; bone resorption; tooth extraction; polypropylene; membranes; TOOTH EXTRACTION; RIDGE PRESERVATION; DIMENSIONAL CHANGES; PLACEMENT; DEFECTS; SOCKETS; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijom.2021.02.005
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This study was performed to evaluate the short-term preservation of alveolar bone volume with or without a polypropylene barrier and exposure of the area after extractions. Thirty posterior tooth extraction sockets were distributed randomly to a control group (n = 15; extraction and suture) and a barrier group (n = 15; extraction, barrier, and suture). All sutures and barriers were removed 10 days postoperatively. Cone beam computed tomography scans taken with the aid of a tomographic guide were obtained preoperatively, immediately postoperative, and at 120 days postoperative. A visual analysis of the coronal sections of the alveolus was performed, and vertical loss in the mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual bone ridges and horizontal thickness were evaluated. The mean vertical loss after extraction did not differ significantly between the control and barrier groups (Student t-test: mesial P = 0.989, buccal P = 0.997, lingual/palatal P = 0.070, distal P = 0.107). The mean vertical loss at 120 days postoperative did not differ significantly between the control (0.65 mm) and barrier (0.52 mm) groups (P > 0.05), with an effect size of 0.13 mm. At 120 days, the barrier group presented a mean resorption in thickness (0.45 mm) that was significantly lower than that in the control group (0.76 mm) (P = 0.021), with an effect size of 0.31 mm. The polypropylene barrier reduced the horizontal resorption in sockets of posterior teeth after extraction.
引用
收藏
页码:1259 / 1266
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine-derived xenograft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial
    Mardas, Nikos
    Chadha, Vivek
    Donos, Nikolaos
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (07) : 688 - 698
  • [22] Ridge preservation following tooth extraction using mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft compared to mineralized solvent-dehydrated bone allograft: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Corning, Patrick J.
    Mealey, Brian L.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2019, 90 (02) : 126 - 133
  • [23] Radiographic evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Philipp, Alexander
    Annen, Beat M.
    Signorelli, Luca
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Haemmerle, Christoph H. F.
    Attin, Thomas
    Schmidlin, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2013, 40 (01) : 90 - 98
  • [24] Three-dimensional analysis of dimensional changes after alveolar ridge preservation with bone substitutes or plasma rich in growth factors: Randomized and controlled clinical trial
    Stumbras, Arturas
    Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
    Januzis, Gintaras
    Juodzbalys, Gintaras
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (01) : 96 - 106
  • [25] Ridge Preservation After Maxillary Third Molar Extraction Using 30% Porosity PLGA/HA/β-TCP Scaffolds With and Without Simvastatin: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Oliveira, Miguel Noronha
    Rau, Levy Hermes
    Marodin, Aline
    Correa, Marcio
    Correa, Leticia Ruhland
    Aragones, Aguedo
    Magini, Ricardo de Souza
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2017, 26 (06) : 832 - 840
  • [26] Synthetic polymeric barrier membrane associated with blood coagulum, human allograft, or bovine bone substitute for ridge preservation: a randomized, controlled, clinical and histological trial
    Santana, R.
    Gyurko, R.
    Kanasi, E.
    Xu, W. P.
    Dibart, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 48 (05) : 675 - 683
  • [27] Comparative assessment of anterior maxillary alveolar ridge preservation with and without adjunctive use of enamel matrix derivative: A randomized clinical trial
    Lee, Jae-Hong
    Kim, Do-Hyung
    Jeong, Seong-Nyum
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [28] Clinical applications of concentrated growth factors combined with bone substitutes for alveolar ridge preservation in maxillary molar area: a randomized controlled trial
    Lin, Shi-chen
    Li, Xin
    Liu, Hang
    Wu, Fang
    Yang, Lian
    Su, Ya
    Li, Jun
    Duan, Shao-yu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [29] Clinical evaluation of 3D printed nano- porous hydroxyapatite bone graft for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled trial
    Kijartorn, Pennapa
    Wongpairojpanich, Jirapa
    Thammarakcharoen, Faungchat
    Suwanprateeb, Jintamai
    Buranawat, Borvornwut
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2022, 17 (01) : 194 - 203
  • [30] The Assessment of Volumetric Changes for Alveolar Ridge Preservation or Reconstruction by 3D Analysis at Posterior Extraction Sites with Severe Bone Defects Using DBBM-C Collagen Membrane and PRF: A Prospective and Randomized Clinical Trial
    Yu, Haina
    Cai, Qing
    Li, Baosheng
    Meng, Weiyan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2024, 44 (06) : 673 - +